IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp18561.html

Italian Academics and External Activities: An Ineffective Reform?

Author

Listed:
  • Checchi, Daniele

    (University of Milan)

  • Defraja, Gianni

    (University of Nottigham)

  • Marra, Alfredo

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

  • Verzillo, Stefano

    (European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC))

Abstract

We investigate the impact of a reform introduced in Italy in 2010 (Law 240/2010, known as the Gelmini reform) that aimed to liberalise external economic activities for academics, whose pay had been effectively frozen for the previous seven years. The reform partially liberalised remunerated external activities while simultaneously restructuring university governance to expand institutional autonomy and strengthen central assessment of academic performance. Using administrative data from a representative sample of Italian academics, we compute both extensive (participation) and intensive (incidence relative to salary) margins of external activities. Our main finding is that the reform did not alter the behaviour of Italian academics. Among the possible explanations, we suggest the substantial leeway to restrict academics' remunerated external activities enjoyed by universities' administration under the new governance framework and the interpretations in the Court of Auditors, which also restricted the range of permissible activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Checchi, Daniele & Defraja, Gianni & Marra, Alfredo & Verzillo, Stefano, 2026. "Italian Academics and External Activities: An Ineffective Reform?," IZA Discussion Papers 18561, IZA Network @ LISER.
    • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp18561.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.