IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/irs/iriswp/2003-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Excluded or reintegrated? Compared analysis of the paths and exit careers to get out of the risk of social exclusion in Italy, Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark

Author

Listed:
  • CARBONE Domenico

Abstract

The present research intends to analysis the paths to come out of social exclusion risk in four European countries: Italy, Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark; in order to investigate if these paths are different in each context or, on the contrary, if it

Suggested Citation

  • CARBONE Domenico, 2003. "Excluded or reintegrated? Compared analysis of the paths and exit careers to get out of the risk of social exclusion in Italy, Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark," IRISS Working Paper Series 2003-04, IRISS at CEPS/INSTEAD.
    • Handle: RePEc:irs:iriswp:2003-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://liser.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/excluded-or-reintegrated-compared-analysis-of-the-paths-and-exit-
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugo Trivellato, 1999. "Issues in the Design and Analysis of Panel Studies: A Cursory Review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 339-351, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Yáñez & Patricio Mansilla & Juan de Ortúzar, 2010. "The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 125-149, January.
    2. Toepoel, V. & Das, J.W.M. & van Soest, A.H.O., 2008. "Relating Question Type to Panel Conditioning : A Comparison between Trained and Fresh Respondents," Discussion Paper 2008-4, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Marcel Das & Vera Toepoel & Arthur van Soest, 2011. "Nonparametric Tests of Panel Conditioning and Attrition Bias in Panel Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(1), pages 32-56, February.
    4. Toepoel, V. & Das, J.W.M. & van Soest, A.H.O., 2008. "Design Effects in Web Surveys : Comparing Trained and Fresh Respondents," Discussion Paper 2008-51, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. D’Aurizio Leandro & Papadia Giuseppina, 2019. "Using Administrative Data to Evaluate Sampling Bias in a Business Panel Survey," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(1), pages 67-92, March.
    6. Rene Segers & Philip Hans Franses, 2014. "Panel design effects on response rates and response quality," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(1), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Das, J.W.M. & Toepoel, V. & van Soest, A.H.O., 2007. "Can I use a Panel? Panel Conditioning and Attrition Bias in Panel Surveys," Discussion Paper 2007-56, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Toepoel, V., 2008. "A closer look at web questionnaire design," Other publications TiSEM 119506d1-f613-46f5-ad59-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Marjo Pyy-Martikainen & Ulrich Rendtel, 2008. "Assessing the impact of initial nonresponse and attrition in the analysis of unemployment duration with panel surveys," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 92(3), pages 297-318, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:irs:iriswp:2003-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philippe Van Kerm (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepsslu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.