IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc143331.html

Method for the ranking of potential requirements, based on expected impacts and costs

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The aim of this report is to contribute to the development of the methodology for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products for the implementation of the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). Starting from the analysis of the Methodology for the Ecodesign of Energy-related Products (MEErP), used under the Ecodesign Directive (on energy-related products), and considering the extended scope of the ESPR, this report proposes indications for the identification of improved design options (DOs), as well as a methodology to assess, define and rank paths of DOs, taking into account their interactions. A more systemic definition of DO than the one provided in the MEErP is proposed, since it is recognised in literature that, to achieve optimal product sustainability, the focus should expand from the product to the system level (Schöggl et al., 2024). The identification of the DOs should be a multi-disciplinary activity, which considers technological, environmental and market-related aspects. The creation and validation of DO paths is supported by the use of Life-cycle Assessment. Moreover, the optimal design configuration for each path is identified by using life-cycle costing (LCC). Finally, the DOs are ranked applying societal LCC: factors for the monetisation of environmental externalities are proposed. Eventually the result should be complemented with considerations on social aspects and policy objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Magrini Chiara & Rodriguez Manotas Judit & Gonzalez Torres Maria & Senatore Vincenzo & Gama Caldas Miguel & Kouloumpis Viktor & Maury Thibaut & Amadei Andrea & Venturelli Sara, 2025. "Method for the ranking of potential requirements, based on expected impacts and costs," JRC Research Reports JRC143331, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC143331
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahlroth, Sofia, 2014. "The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 34-41.
    2. Perez Camacho M Nati & Cappucci Grazia Maria & Faraca Giorgia & Bracalente Giulio & Bennett Michael John & Garcia John Enrique, 2025. "Method for the identification and tracking of substances of concern in products and for the preparation of restriction measures on the use of substances in products," JRC Research Reports JRC143683, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Rosalie Arendt & Till M. Bachmann & Masaharu Motoshita & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2020. "Comparison of Different Monetization Methods in LCA: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-39, December.
    4. RODRIGUEZ QUINTERO Rocio & BERNAD BELTRAN David & RANEA PALMA Maria & DONATELLO Shane & VILLANUEVA KRZYZANIAK Alejandro & PARASKEVAS Dimos & BOYANO LARRIBA Alicia & STAMMINGER Rainer, 2022. "Preparatory study of Ecodesign and Energy Labelling measures for domestic cooking appliances," JRC Research Reports JRC130716, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Marcus Linder & Mats Williander, 2017. "Circular Business Model Innovation: Inherent Uncertainties," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 182-196, February.
    6. Mateusz Lewandowski, 2016. "Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Cludius, Johanna & de Bruyn, Sander & Schumacher, Katja & Vergeer, Robert, 2020. "Ex-post investigation of cost pass-through in the EU ETS - an analysis for six industry sectors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiebke Reim & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2021. "Circular business model implementation: A capability development case study from the manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2745-2757, September.
    2. Nancy Bocken & Lars Strupeit & Katherine Whalen & Julia Nußholz, 2019. "A Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Helen Toxopeus & Elisa Achterberg & Friedemann Polzin, 2021. "How can firms access bank finance for circular business model innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2773-2795, September.
    4. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    5. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Federico Adrodegari & Marco Perona & Nicola Saccani, 2018. "Exploring How Usage-Focused Business Models Enable Circular Economy through Digital Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Friedrich A. Halstenberg & Kai Lindow & Rainer Stark, 2019. "Leveraging Circular Economy through a Methodology for Smart Service Systems Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-36, June.
    7. Marlies van Tilburg & Harold Krikke & Wim Lambrechts, 2022. "Supply Chain Relationships in Circular Business Models: Supplier Tactics at Royal Smit Transformers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Armaghan Chizaryfard & Paolo Trucco & Cali Nuur, 2021. "The transformation to a circular economy: framing an evolutionary view," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 475-504, April.
    9. Chong-Wen Chen, 2018. "Guidance on the Conceptual Design of Sustainable Product–Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Alessandro Gandolfo & Lorenzo Lupi, 2021. "Circular economy, the transition of an incumbent focal firm: How to successfully reconcile environmental and economic sustainability?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3297-3308, November.
    11. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    12. Nine Klaassen & Arno Scheepens & Bas Flipsen & Joost Vogtlander, 2020. "Eco-Efficient Value Creation of Residential Street Lighting Systems by Simultaneously Analysing the Value, the Costs and the Eco-Costs during the Design and Engineering Phase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    14. Olga Rataj & Serdar Türkeli, 2024. "Success Factors for Scaling Up and Raising Investment by Circular Entrepreneurs in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1021-1046, June.
    15. Antonella Zucchella & Pietro Previtali & Roger Strange, 2022. "Proactive and reactive views in the transition towards circular business models. A grounded study in the plastic packaging industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1073-1102, September.
    16. Fabio A. Madau & Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina, 2020. "Insect Farming for Feed and Food Production from a Circular Business Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    18. Amirhossein Taghipour & Wareerath Akkalatham, 2021. "Circular Economy of Steel Recycling Companies in Thailand," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 907-913, November.
    19. Marina V. Evseeva, 2020. "Comparative effectiveness of high-tech and medium-tech business models: Key indicators and value sustainability," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 59-71, July.
    20. María Jesús Ávila-Gutiérrez & Alejandro Martín-Gómez & Francisco Aguayo-González & Juan Ramón Lama-Ruiz, 2020. "Eco-Holonic 4.0 Circular Business Model to Conceptualize Sustainable Value Chain towards Digital Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.