IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc143331.html

Method for the ranking of potential requirements, based on expected impacts and costs

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The aim of this report is to contribute to the development of the methodology for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products for the implementation of the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). Starting from the analysis of the Methodology for the Ecodesign of Energy-related Products (MEErP), used under the Ecodesign Directive (on energy-related products), and considering the extended scope of the ESPR, this report proposes indications for the identification of improved design options (DOs), as well as a methodology to assess, define and rank paths of DOs, taking into account their interactions. A more systemic definition of DO than the one provided in the MEErP is proposed, since it is recognised in literature that, to achieve optimal product sustainability, the focus should expand from the product to the system level (Schöggl et al., 2024). The identification of the DOs should be a multi-disciplinary activity, which considers technological, environmental and market-related aspects. The creation and validation of DO paths is supported by the use of Life-cycle Assessment. Moreover, the optimal design configuration for each path is identified by using life-cycle costing (LCC). Finally, the DOs are ranked applying societal LCC: factors for the monetisation of environmental externalities are proposed. Eventually the result should be complemented with considerations on social aspects and policy objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Magrini Chiara & Rodriguez Manotas Judit & Gonzalez Torres Maria & Senatore Vincenzo & Gama Caldas Miguel & Kouloumpis Viktor & Maury Thibaut & Amadei Andrea & Venturelli Sara, 2025. "Method for the ranking of potential requirements, based on expected impacts and costs," JRC Research Reports JRC143331, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC143331
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.