IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ins/quaeco/qf0904.html

On Keynes’s criticism of the Loanable Funds Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Giancarlo Bertocco

    (Department of Economics, University of Insubria, Italy)

Abstract

Contemporary monetary theory, by accepting the theses of the Loanable funds theory, distances itself from Keynes, who considered the rate of interest as an exclusively monetary phenomenon, and overlooks the arguments Keynes used, following publication of the General Theory, to respond to the criticism of supporters of the Loanable funds theory such as Ohlin and Robertson. This paper aims to assert that the explicit consideration of the role of banks in financing firms‘ investments connected with the specification of the finance motive does not imply acceptance of the LFT, which holds that the interest rate is a real phenomenon determined by saving decisions, but makes it possible to elaborate a theory of credit alternative to the LFT and a sounder theory of the non neutrality of money than the one based on the liquidity preference theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Giancarlo Bertocco, 2009. "On Keynes’s criticism of the Loanable Funds Theory," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0904, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    • Handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf0904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.eco.uninsubria.it/RePEc/pdf/QF2009_6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. alberto, botta, 2011. "Fiscal policy, eurobonds and economic recovery: some heterodox policy recipes against financial instability and sovereign debt crisis," MPRA Paper 33860, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Gloria Dhahabu & Gitonga Doreen & Barasa Eliakim & Moses Kiarie & Ruth Kibaara & Dismas Omimi & Evusa Zablon & Ngeta Jacqueline, 2022. "Effect of Financial Risks on Financial Performance of Tier One Commercial Banks in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(6), pages 261-270, June.
    3. Spahn, Peter, 2024. "Monetärer Keynesianismus: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion von Hajo Rieses "Theorie der Geldwirtschaft"," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 02-2024, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    4. Marc Lavoie, 2014. "A comment on 'Endogenous money and effective demand': a revolution or a step backwards?," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 321-332, July.
    5. Faruk Ülgen, 2015. "From liberal finance inconsistency to relevant systemic regulation : an institutionalist analysis," Post-Print halshs-01166696, HAL.
    6. Giancarlo Bertocco & Andrea Kalajzić, 2022. "On the monetary nature of savings: a critical analysis of the Loanable Funds Theory," Working Papers PKWP2206, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    7. Giancarlo Bertocco & Andrea Kalajzić, 2023. "A critical analysis of the loanable funds theory: some notes on the non-neutrality of money," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(1), pages 35-55, April.
    8. Pesenti, Amos, 2015. "The origin of inflation in a domestic bank-based payment system," FSES Working Papers 457, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    9. Spahn, Peter, 2019. "Keynesian capital theory: Declining interest rates and persisting profits," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 10-2019, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    10. Kehrwald, Bernie, 2014. "The Excess Demand Theory of Money," MPRA Paper 57603, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ins:quaeco:qf0904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Segreteria Dipartimento (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feinsit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.