IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/2017-161.html

Basel Compliance and Financial Stability: Evidence from Islamic Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Bitar
  • Sami Ben Naceur
  • Rym Ayadi
  • Thomas Walker

Abstract

The paper provides robust evidence that compliance with Basel Core Principles (BCPs) has a strong positive effect on the Z-score of conventional banks, albeit less pronounced on the Zscore of Islamic banks. Using a sample of banks operating in 19 developing countries, the results appear to be driven by capital ratios, a component of Z-score for the two types of banks. Even though smaller on Islamic banks, individual chapters of BCPs also suggest a positive effect on the stability of conventional banks. The findings support the effective role of BCP standards in improving bank stability, whose important implications led to the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) publication of new recommendations in 2015 to bring BCP standards in line with the Core Principles for Islamic Finance Regulation (CPIFRs) standards. Our findings suggest that because Islamic banks are benchmarked closely to BCPs, the implementation of CPFIRs should also positively affect their stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Bitar & Sami Ben Naceur & Rym Ayadi & Thomas Walker, 2017. "Basel Compliance and Financial Stability: Evidence from Islamic Banks," IMF Working Papers 2017/161, International Monetary Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2017/161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=45040
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Alsharif & Faisal Alnori, 2025. "How do the capital structure and adjustment speed of Islamic banks differ from those of conventional banks? Evidence from the GCC region," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Bitar, Mohammad & Hassan, M. Kabir & Saad, Wadad, 2020. "Culture and the capital–performance nexus in dual banking systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 34-58.
    3. Samar Issa, 2020. "Life after Debt: The Effects of Overleveraging on Conventional and Islamic Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-46, June.
    4. Bitar, Mohammad & Kabir Hassan, M. & Hippler, William J., 2018. "The determinants of Islamic bank capital decisions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 48-68.
    5. Hafiz Hoque & Heng Liu, 2023. "Impact of bank regulation on risk of Islamic and conventional banks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 1025-1062, January.
    6. Sepúlveda Velásquez, Jorge & Tapia Griñen, Pablo & Pastén Henríquez, Boris, 2023. "Mandatory dividends and economic policy uncertainty: A challenge for investment opportunities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Dibooglu, Sel & Cevik, Emrah I. & Tamimi, Hussein A. Hassan Al, 2022. "Credit default risk in Islamic and conventional banks: Evidence from a GARCH option pricing model," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 396-411.
    8. Adalessossi, Kokou, 2023. "Impact of E-Banking on the Islamic bank profitability in Sub-Saharan Africa: What are the financial determinants?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Samar Issa, 2022. "Financial Crises and Business Cycle Implications for Islamic and Non-Islamic Bank Lending in Indonesia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, June.
    10. Abdullah Aloqab & Farouk Alobaidi & Bassam Raweh, 2018. "Operational Risk Management in Financial Institutions: An Overview," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 11-32, June.
    11. Wahyu Jatmiko & M. Shahid Ebrahim & Abdullah Iqbal & Rafal M. Wojakowski, 2023. "Can trade credit rejuvenate Islamic banking?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 111-146, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • P51 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2017/161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Akshay Modi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.