IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/13665.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ROC Curve Analysis for Randomly Selected Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Bandyopadhyay, Tathagata
  • Sumanta Adhya
  • Guha, Apratim

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) are widely used in medical studies to examine the effectiveness of markers in diagnosing diseases. In most of the existing literature for ROC curve analysis it is assumed that the healthy and the diseased populations are independent of each other, which may lead to bias in the studies. In this paper we consider the disease status as a binary random variable. Assuming the disease status is determined by a latent variable and the marker and the latent variable have a bivariate normal distribution, we derive the properties of the ROC curve and the AUC. We also look at the problem of choosing optimum combination of markers when multiple markers are present. Limiting distributions are obtained and confidence intervals are discussed as well. A small simulation study is performed which confirms the superiority of our methods over the general practice of considering the two populations to be independent.

Suggested Citation

  • Bandyopadhyay, Tathagata & Sumanta Adhya & Guha, Apratim, 2015. "ROC Curve Analysis for Randomly Selected Patients," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-07-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:13665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/10365865472015-07-02.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holly Janes & Gary Longton & Margaret S. Pepe, 2009. "Accommodating covariates in receiver operating characteristic analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(1), pages 17-39, March.
    2. Holly Janes & Margaret S. Pepe, 2008. "Matching in Studies of Classification Accuracy: Implications for Analysis, Efficiency, and Assessment of Incremental Value," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Y. Huang & M. S. Pepe, 2009. "A Parametric ROC Model-Based Approach for Evaluating the Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Case–Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1133-1144, December.
    2. Pastwa, Anna M. & Shrestha, Prabal & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: a topic modeling approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021018, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    3. Thewissen, James & Shrestha, Prabal & Torsin, Wouter & Pastwa, Anna M., 2022. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: A topic modeling approach," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:13665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.