IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/wpaper/wp20-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia's New Trade Blocs

Author

Listed:
  • Peter A. Petri

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Michael G. Plummer

    (Johns Hopkins University)

Abstract

The deepening US-China trade war and nationalist reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic are reshaping global economic relationships. Alongside these developments, two new megaregional trade agreements, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), will refocus East Asia's economic ties in the region itself. The new accords are moving forward without the United States and India, once seen as critical partners in the CPTPP and RCEP, respectively. Using a computable general equilibrium model, we show that the agreements will raise global national incomes in 2030 by an annual $147 billion and $186 billion, respectively. They will yield especially large benefits for China, Japan, and South Korea and losses for the United States and India. These effects are simulated both in a business-as-before-Trump environment and in the context of a sustained US-China trade war. The effects were simulated before the COVID-19 shock but seem increasingly likely in the wake of the pandemic. Compared with business as before, the trade war generates large global losses rising to $301 billion annually by 2030. The new agreements offset the effects of the trade war globally, but not for the United States and China. The trade war makes RCEP especially valuable because it strengthens East Asian interdependence, raising trade among members by $428 billion and reducing trade among nonmembers by $48 billion. These shifts bring regional ties closer to institutional arrangements proposed in the 1990s and incentivize greater cooperation among China, Japan, and South Korea.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2020. "East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia's New Trade Blocs," Working Paper Series WP20-09, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp20-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/east-asia-decouples-united-states-trade-war-covid-19-and-east-asias-new
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karen Jackson & Oleksandr Shepotylo, 2023. "Transforming East Asia: Regional Integration in a Trade War Era," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 657-672, July.
    2. Shiro Armstrong, 2021. "Economic Diplomacy and Economic Security under Abe," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 16(2), pages 283-299, July.
    3. Fukunari Kimura & Shujiro Urata & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko, 2022. "The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Challenges and Opportunities for ASEAN and East Asia," Chapters, in: Fukunari Kimura & Shujiro Urata & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko (ed.), Dynamism of East Asia and RCEP: The Framework for Regional Integration, chapter 1, pages 1-11, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    4. Ken Itakura, 2022. "Impact of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: A Global Computable General Equilibrium Simulation," Chapters, in: Fukunari Kimura & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko (ed.), Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN, chapter 5, pages 111-140, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    5. Fan Yang & Yongrok Choi & Hyoungsuk Lee, 2021. "Convergence or Divergence? Emission Performance in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Lintunen, Julia, 2021. "An overview of China's regional trade agreements," BOFIT Policy Briefs 1/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    7. He, Xi & Yang, Anton & Balistreri, Edward J. & Zhang, Wendong, 2021. "Agricultural Trade Impacts of RCEP: an Integrated Partial Equilibrium and General Equilibrium Assessment," Conference papers 333312, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Shiro Armstrong & Peter Drysdale, 2022. "The Implications of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership for Asian Regional Architecture," Chapters, in: Fukunari Kimura & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko (ed.), Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN, chapter 9, pages 247-267, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    9. Tamara OSTASHKO, 2021. "Multipolarity Of The World Trade: Challenges And "Corridor Of Opportunities" For Ukraine," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 4, pages 29-52.
    10. Guo, Dong & Zhou, Peng, 2021. "The rise of a new anchor currency in RCEP? A tale of three currencies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Marc Atkins & Christian Peitz, 2023. "The world's largest free trade agreement RCEP and its financial markets - A perspective on volatility and risk," Working Papers Dissertations 113, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    12. Shandre Thangavelu & Shujiro Urata & Dionisius A Narjoko, 2021. "Impacts of the RCEP on ASEAN and ASEAN Least Developed Countries in the Post-pandemic Recovery," Working Papers PB-2021-01, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    13. Michael Frenkel & Tuyet Ngo, 2021. "Das RCEP-Abkommen und dessen Bedeutung für die EU [The RCEP and Its Relevance to the EU]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(6), pages 432-438, June.
    14. Innwon Park, 2022. "Comparison of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and Other Free Trade Agreements," Chapters, in: Fukunari Kimura & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko (ed.), Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN, chapter 3, pages 45-82, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    15. Fukunari Kimura & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko (ed.), 2022. "Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 978-6025-460-44-9, July.
    16. Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Shujiro Urata & Dionisius Narjoko, 2022. "The Post COVID-19 and RCEP: Pandemic Recovery in East Asia," Chapters, in: Fukunari Kimura & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Dionisius Narjoko (ed.), Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN, chapter 7, pages 171-194, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    17. Xinxiong Wu & Chen Chen Yong & Su Teng Lee, 2022. "Addressing the COVID-19 Shock: The Potential Job Creation in China by the RCEP," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Iván Kataryniuk & Javier Pérez & Francesca Viani, 2021. "(De-)Globalisation of trade and regionalisation: a survey of the facts and arguments," Occasional Papers 2124, Banco de España.
    19. Wei Luo & Siyuan Kang & Sheng Hu & Lixian Su & Rui Dai, 2023. "Dual Effects of the US-China Trade War and COVID-19 on United States Imports: Transfer of China's industrial chain?," Papers 2309.02271, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    RCEP; CPTPP; East Asia; Regional Economic Integration; CGE Modeling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp20-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.