Technology governance in radiology: the example of magnetic resonance imaging
WThis report aims to be the gathering of the main ideas that culminated in the presentation at the 1st Winter School of the PhD Programme on Technology Assessment (FCT-UNL) in December 2010. It is a guideline for future work development regarding Technology Assessment in Radiology, particularly having Magnetic Resonance Imaging, as an example. Therefore, as a background, it is necessary to understand what is “Technology Assessment”, how it developed and what it Europe’s interest in this area. Doing a transposition of this subject to health area, it is also important to understand the particularities of Health Technology Assessment. Portugal framework on this subject will also be addressed. As so, the Portuguese National Health System is characterized and the decision-making stakeholders identified, has well as the competences for the decision-making process in general. More generally, the different stakeholders perception involved in decision making, the mapping skills on technology assessment and decision making, the identification of indicators present in this decision making in Radiology, particularly in Magnetic Resonance area, are subjects to be addressed. To accomplish this, a research methodology was outlined, so that six research questions could be answered and five hypotheses could be accepted or refuted, in the future. With this research methodology, the Portuguese state of the art Magnetic Resonance equipment existence will be studied, using a survey as a resource. In the future, a mapping stakeholder technique will be used to identify the decision making key stakeholders and a survey will be applied to map theirs skills and competences in the process, where a pre-test was already applied.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2012|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 21 790 83 00 ext. 1218/1488|
Phone: 212948503 ext.10401
Web page: http://www.cics.nova.fcsh.unl.pt/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Perry, Seymour & Thamer, Mae, 1997. "Health technology assessment: Decentralized and fragmented in the US compared to other countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 177-198, June.
- Oortwijn, Wija & Banta, David & Vondeling, Hindrik & Bouter, Lex, 1999. "Identification and priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: actors and activities," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 241-253, May.
- Stephan, Jean Claude, 1988. "Technology assessment at the French National Centre for hospital equipment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 341-347, June.
- Maria João Maia & António Brandão Moniz, 2011. "Competências para a Tomada de Decisão na Radiologia: Uma abordagem de Avaliação de Tecnologia [Competences for decision taking in Radiology: A Technology Assessment approach]," IET Working Papers Series 02/2011, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology.
- Chrzanowski, Richard & Gutzwiller, Felix, 1986. "The assessment of medical technologies. Examples from Switzerland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 45-55.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ieu:wpaper:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (António Brandão Moniz)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.