IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das dritte gossensche Gesetz - Zur Ueberlieferungspraxis in der oeconomischen Dogmenhistorie


  • Katrin Hirte

    (Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)


Eine zentrale Forderung innerhalb der Pluralismusdebatte der Okonomik ist die Integrierung von dogmenhistorischen Inhalten in die Lehre. Dies fuehrt allerdings zu der Frage, auf welche dogmenhistorische Inhalte dabei zurueckgegriffen wird. Nachstehend wird anhand des Beispiels Hermann Heinrich Gossen, der als Begruender der so genannten Grenznutzenschule in der Oekonomik gilt, die Problematik der Ueberlieferungspraxis aufgezeigt. Hier signalisiert schon die Existenz des so genannten dritten gossenschen Gesetzes, welches in der Ueberlieferungspraxis fehlt, das Kernproblem, welches in einer anachronen Geschichtsschreibung liegt: Uberliefert wird, was aus heutiger Sicht als ueberlieferungswuerdig gilt. Ausgehend von dem dritten gossenschen Gesetz wird daher nachstehend gefragt, was dieses besagt, warum es Gossen als fuer notwendig erachtet hat und welche Probleme sich daraus ergeben. Hier zeigt sich Gossen nicht nur als Nutzen- sondern ebenso auch als Arbeitswerttheoretiker, der mit dem Fokus auf unbegrenzte Beduerfnisse weit ueber die damals uebliche Fokussierung auf materielle Gueter hinausdachte.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrin Hirte, 2019. "Das dritte gossensche Gesetz - Zur Ueberlieferungspraxis in der oeconomischen Dogmenhistorie," ICAE Working Papers 93, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:93

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Donald Mackenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu, 2007. "Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics," Post-Print halshs-00149145, HAL.
    2. repec:mes:jeciss:v:20:y:1986:i:2:p:509-523 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bert Mosselmans, 2000. "The omitted mathematics of Hans von Mangoldt," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 27(4/5), pages 382-393, September.
    4. repec:jns:jbstat:v:208:y:1991:i:1:p:94-97:n:9 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mark Blaug, 1972. "Was There a Marginal Revolution?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 269-280, Fall.
    6. Coats, A W, 1969. "Is There a "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in Economics?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 289-296.
    7. Joseph E Stiglitz, 2018. "Where modern macroeconomics went wrong," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(1-2), pages 70-106.
    8. Paola Tubaro, 2014. "A Tale of Two Destinies: Georgescu-Roegen on Gossen," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 33-54, Spring.
    9. Martin Bronfenbrenner, 1971. "The “Structure of Revolutions” in Economic Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 136-151, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    gossensche Gesetze; Neoklassik; Grenznutzenrechnung;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Teresa Griesebner). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.