IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ico/wpaper/93.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das dritte gossensche Gesetz - Zur Ueberlieferungspraxis in der oeconomischen Dogmenhistorie

Author

Listed:
  • Katrin Hirte

    (Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

Abstract

Eine zentrale Forderung innerhalb der Pluralismusdebatte der Okonomik ist die Integrierung von dogmenhistorischen Inhalten in die Lehre. Dies fuehrt allerdings zu der Frage, auf welche dogmenhistorische Inhalte dabei zurueckgegriffen wird. Nachstehend wird anhand des Beispiels Hermann Heinrich Gossen, der als Begruender der so genannten Grenznutzenschule in der Oekonomik gilt, die Problematik der Ueberlieferungspraxis aufgezeigt. Hier signalisiert schon die Existenz des so genannten dritten gossenschen Gesetzes, welches in der Ueberlieferungspraxis fehlt, das Kernproblem, welches in einer anachronen Geschichtsschreibung liegt: Uberliefert wird, was aus heutiger Sicht als ueberlieferungswuerdig gilt. Ausgehend von dem dritten gossenschen Gesetz wird daher nachstehend gefragt, was dieses besagt, warum es Gossen als fuer notwendig erachtet hat und welche Probleme sich daraus ergeben. Hier zeigt sich Gossen nicht nur als Nutzen- sondern ebenso auch als Arbeitswerttheoretiker, der mit dem Fokus auf unbegrenzte Beduerfnisse weit ueber die damals uebliche Fokussierung auf materielle Gueter hinausdachte.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrin Hirte, 2019. "Das dritte gossensche Gesetz - Zur Ueberlieferungspraxis in der oeconomischen Dogmenhistorie," ICAE Working Papers 93, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jku.at/fileadmin/gruppen/108/ICAE_Working_Papers/wp93.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Mackenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu, 2007. "Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics," Post-Print halshs-00149145, HAL.
    2. Kurt Dopfer, 1986. "Causality and Consciousness in Economics: Concepts of Change in Orthodox and Heterodox Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 509-523, June.
    3. Bert Mosselmans, 2000. "The omitted mathematics of Hans von Mangoldt," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 27(4/5), pages 382-393, September.
    4. Weise Peter, 1991. "Würde Gossen die Gossenschen Gesetze akzeptieren?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 208(1), pages 94-97, January.
    5. Mark Blaug, 1972. "Was There a Marginal Revolution?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 269-280, Fall.
    6. Wolfgang J. Fellner, 2014. "Von der Güter- zur Aktivitätenökonomie," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-658-04191-5, January.
    7. Coats, A W, 1969. "Is There a "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in Economics?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 289-296.
    8. Joseph E Stiglitz, 2018. "Where modern macroeconomics went wrong," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(1-2), pages 70-106.
    9. Paola Tubaro, 2014. "A Tale of Two Destinies: Georgescu-Roegen on Gossen," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 33-54, Spring.
    10. Martin Bronfenbrenner, 1971. "The “Structure of Revolutions” in Economic Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 136-151, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael E. Drew & Madhu Veeraraghavan, 2001. "Asset Pricing In The Asian Region," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 094, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    2. Lilian Muchimba & Alexis Stenfors, 2020. "Beyond LIBOR: Money Markets and the Illusion of Representativeness," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2020-13, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    3. Miguel Henry & George Judge, 2019. "Permutation Entropy and Information Recovery in Nonlinear Dynamic Economic Time Series," Econometrics, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Fine, Ben, 2002. "Economics Imperialism and the New Development Economics as Kuhnian Paradigm Shift?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2057-2070, December.
    5. Leon Wansleben, 2013. "Dreaming with BRICs," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 453-471, November.
    6. Loconto, Allison & Rajão, Raoni, 2020. "Governing by models: Exploring the technopolitics of the (in)visilibities of land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Peter Miller, 2008. "Calculating Economic Life," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 51-64, March.
    8. Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Müller, Karsten, 2019. "Has macroeconomic forecasting changed after the Great Recession? Panel-based evidence on forecast accuracy and forecaster behavior from Germany," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Hervé Dumez, 2010. "Le Libellio d'Aegis," Post-Print hal-00546720, HAL.
    10. Schoder, Christian, 2020. "A Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic Disequilibrium model for business cycle analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 117-132.
    11. Jorge A Chan-Lau & Ran Wang, 2020. "UnFEAR: Unsupervised Feature Extraction Clustering with an Application to Crisis Regimes Classification," IMF Working Papers 2020/262, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Loconto, Allison & Desquilbet, Marion & Moreau, Théo & Couvet, Denis & Dorin, Bruno, 2020. "The land sparing – land sharing controversy: Tracing the politics of knowledge," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Franck Cochoy & Martin Giraudeau & Liz McFall, 2010. "Performativity, Economics And Politics," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 139-146, July.
    14. Benjamin Braun, 2016. "From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 257-273, May.
    15. Sergey Ivashchenko & Semih Emre Çekin & Kevin Kotzé & Rangan Gupta, 2020. "Forecasting with Second-Order Approximations and Markov-Switching DSGE Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 747-771, December.
    16. Beckert, Jens, 2011. "Where do prices come from? Sociological approaches to price formation," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Walter, Christian, 2016. "The financial Logos: The framing of financial decision-making by mathematical modelling," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 597-604.
    18. Ruth Towse, 2013. "Producing pearls of wisdom: a memoir of Mark Blaug's work practice," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 3, pages 14-20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Christian Grimm & Jakob Kapeller & Stephan Puehringer, 2017. "Zum Profil der deutschsprachigen Volkswirtschaftslehre: Paradigmatische Ausrichtung und politische Orientierung deutschsprachiger Oekonom_innen (On the current state of German-speaking Economics: Para," ICAE Working Papers 70, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    20. Miguel Poiares Maduro & Giulio Pasi & Gianluca Misuraca, 2018. "Social Impact Investment in the EU. Financing strategies and outcome oriented approaches for social policy innovation: narratives, experiences, and recommendations," JRC Working Papers JRC111373, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gossensche Gesetze; Neoklassik; Grenznutzenrechnung;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Teresa Griesebner). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/igjkuat.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.