IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hnb/wpaper/32.html

Are some Banks More Lenient in the Implementation of Placement Classification Rules?

Author

Listed:
  • Tomislav Ridzak

    (The Croatian National Bank, Croatia)

Abstract

This research aims to analyse differences in the credit risk classification amongst commercial banks. Placement classification systems used by banks cannot be thoroughly examined without a detailed knowledge of the actual quality of individual placements, and no regulator has the opportunity to gain such an insight into loan portfolios. This research presents a somewhat roundabout approach, based on a comparison of differences in placement classification of a common portfolio, using the Rasch model to assess the relative strictness of banks. In addition to providing valuable information for the performance of the supervisory function, the results can also aid the assessment of financial stability in the banking system, as they allow quick evaluation of risk management practices in the banking system and detecting outlying banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomislav Ridzak, 2012. "Are some Banks More Lenient in the Implementation of Placement Classification Rules?," Working Papers 32, The Croatian National Bank, Croatia.
    • Handle: RePEc:hnb:wpaper:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.hnb.hr/documents/20182/121372/w-032.pdf/2ea104e0-560c-4910-bdd4-db3e4647b82e?t=1620029093087
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mair, Patrick & Hatzinger, Reinhold, 2007. "Extended Rasch Modeling: The eRm Package for the Application of IRT Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i09).
    2. Mr. In W Song, 2002. "Collateral in Loan Classification and Provisioning," IMF Working Papers 2002/122, International Monetary Fund.
    3. repec:wbk:wbpubs:15157 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. repec:jss:jstsof:39:i08 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Frick, Hannah & Strobl, Carolin & Leisch, Friedrich & Zeileis, Achim, 2012. "Flexible Rasch Mixture Models with Package psychomix," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i07).
    4. Veggi, Manuele & von Gal, Alessandro & Piccardi, Laura & Pescarin, Sofia & Nori, Raffaella, 2025. "How Much Do We Care About Cultural Heritage? A Rasch Scale Validation Study Among Young Adult," SocArXiv 5baw8_v1, Center for Open Science.
    5. Cervantes, Víctor H., 2017. "DFIT: An R Package for Raju's Differential Functioning of Items and Tests Framework," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i05).
    6. Yuanyuan Chen & Zhen Wang & Xiaoyu Zheng & Zhiyin Wu & Jianjun Zhu, 2022. "The Chinese version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scale: Psychometric properties in a sample of young adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, June.
    7. repec:jss:jstsof:20:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:39:i12 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Shrum, Trisha & Donovan, Christopher & Bloch, Sadie & Cripps, Emma & Boyson, Ceclia, 2024. "The REBL Score: A dynamic measure of pro-environmental behavior," OSF Preprints w92se, Center for Open Science.
    10. Piero Veronese & Eugenio Melilli, 2021. "Confidence Distribution for the Ability Parameter of the Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 131-166, March.
    11. repec:jss:jstsof:36:c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:jss:jstsof:20:i06 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    14. repec:jss:jstsof:35:i12 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Maria Adam Nyangasa & Christoph Buck & Soerge Kelm & Mohammed Sheikh & Antje Hebestreit, 2019. "Exploring Food Access and Sociodemographic Correlates of Food Consumption and Food Insecurity in Zanzibari Households," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Clemens Draxler & Andreas Kurz, 2021. "Conditional Inference in Small Sample Scenarios Using a Resampling Approach," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Alessi, Lucia & Bruno, Brunella & Carletti, Elena & Neugebauer, Katja, 2019. "What drives bank coverage ratios: Evidence from the euro area," JRC Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2019-14, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    18. Ellen Gaston & Mr. In W Song, 2014. "Supervisory Roles in Loan Loss Provisioning in Countries Implementing IFRS," IMF Working Papers 2014/170, International Monetary Fund.
    19. Carolin Strobl & Julia Kopf & Achim Zeileis, 2011. "A new method for detecting differential item functioning in the Rasch model," Working Papers 2011-01, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    20. Carla Sabariego & Cornelia Oberhauser & Aleksandra Posarac & Jerome Bickenbach & Nenad Kostanjsek & Somnath Chatterji & Alana Officer & Michaela Coenen & Lay Chhan & Alarcos Cieza, 2015. "Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.
    21. Benjamin Ambuehl & Jennifer Inauen, 2022. "Contextualized Measurement Scale Adaptation: A 4-Step Tutorial for Health Psychology Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    22. Annalina Sarra & Adelia Evangelista & Barbara Iannone & Tonio Battista, 2023. "Looking for patterns of change amid pandemic period in students’ evaluation of academic teaching," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4759-4777, October.
    23. Wenjia Wang & Mickaël Guedj & Viviane Bertrand & Julie Foucquier & Elisabeth Jouve & Daniel Commenges & Cécile Proust-Lima & Niall P Murphy & Olivier Blin & Laurent Magy & Daniel Cohen & Shahram Attar, 2017. "A Rasch Analysis of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score (CMTNS) in a Cohort of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 1A Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    24. Rikkert M. van der Lans & Ridwan Maulana & Michelle Helms-Lorenz & Carmen-María Fernández-García & Seyeoung Chun & Thelma de Jager & Yulia Irnidayanti & Mercedes Inda-Caro & Okhwa Lee & Thys Coetze, 2021. "Student Perceptions of Teaching Quality in Five Countries: A Partial Credit Model Approach to Assess Measurement Invariance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    25. Sören Kliem & Johannes Beller & Christoph Kröger & Yve Stöbel-Richter & Kurt Hahlweg & Elmar Brähler, 2015. "A Rasch Re-Analysis of the Partnership Questionnaire," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    26. Richa Verma Bajaj & Gargi Sanati & Chetan Lodha, 2024. "Impact Assessment Study of NPAs and Rate of Recovery: Are Private Sector Banks in India Better off?," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(3), pages 724-749, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hnb:wpaper:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romana Sinković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hnb.hr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.