IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/ihewps/2024_001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tackling inequalities in cancer care in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Pousette, Andreas

    (IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics)

  • Hofmarcher, Thomas

    (IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics)

Abstract

This report sheds light on inequalities in cancer care across the EU and provides recommendations for improvement. The report highlights inequalities between and within countries. Five case studies are analyzed relating to HPV vaccination, colorectal cancer screening, biomarker testing, cancer medicines and evidence-based care, access to financial products for survivors (‘the right to be forgotten’). Across the EU, the chances of patients surviving cancer depends crucially on one’s place of residence. For instance, the five-year survival rate of colon cancer ranges from 50% in the worst-performing country to nearly 70% in the best-performing country. For breast cancer, survival rates range from just above 70% to around 90%. One underlying factor contributing to between-country inequalities in patient outcomes may be the level of per-capita spending on cancer care. Spending ranges from €50–100 per capita in Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, and Romania to €250–300 in Austria, the Benelux countries, France, and Germany (adjusted for purchasing power parities). However, spending on cancer care only partially seems to explain between-country inequalities. The report emphasizes the critical role of how funds are used to provide high-quality care in order to address inequalities in patient outcomes. For each case study, inequalities across six dimensions (countries, sex, age, education level, socioeconomic status, urbanization level) are studied. The findings reveal large between-country inequalities in the EU along the entire disease pathway, such as HPV vaccination rates of girls ranging from less than 10% in Bulgaria to over 90% in Portugal or colorectal cancer screening rates ranging from around 5% in Bulgaria, Cyprus, and Romania to 76% in Denmark. There are also notable within-country inequalities. Factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and rural/urban place of residence demonstrate high levels of inequalities. Individual aspects relating to health literacy also influence access to cancer care. Common reasons for the observed inequalities between countries include the political prioritization of cancer care, health expenditure on cancer care (funding), availability of supporting infrastructure, availability of medical professionals, up-to-dateness of clinical guidelines. Reasons for inequalities within countries include the level of health literacy and the geographic distance to university hospitals and comprehensive cancer centers. Top-level recommendations to national policymakers to enhance and ensure more equal access to cancer care for everyone are the following: • Improve personal and organizational health literacy of cancer patients and the public • Ensure education and continuous training of medical staff • Adopt innovations in early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer • Take a societal perspective in national cancer control planning • Collect relevant data and continuously evaluate the quality of cancer care services

Suggested Citation

  • Pousette, Andreas & Hofmarcher, Thomas, 2024. "Tackling inequalities in cancer care in the European Union," IHE Report / IHE Rapport 2024:1, IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:ihewps:2024_001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ihe.se/app/uploads/2024/01/IHE-REPORT-2024_1_.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynne F Forrest & Jean Adams & Helen Wareham & Greg Rubin & Martin White, 2013. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Lung Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Hofmarcher, Thomas & Lindgren, Peter & Wilking, Nils, 2022. "Diagnosed but not treated: How to improve patient access to advanced NSCLC treatment in Europe," IHE Report / IHE Rapport 2022:2, IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hofmarcher, Thomas & Lindgren, Peter & Wilking, Nils, 2022. "Cancer Care in Türkiye in a European Context," IHE Report / IHE Rapport 2022:10, IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics.
    2. Domantas Jasilionis & Giedre Smailyte & Ieva Vincerzevskiene & Vladimir Shkolnikov, 2015. "Educational differentials in cancer mortality and avoidable deaths in Lithuania, 2001–2009: a census-linked study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(8), pages 919-926, December.
    3. Manzano, Andrea & Hofmarcher, Thomas, 2023. "Improving the care of women with triple-negative breast cancer," IHE Report / IHE Rapport 2023:2, IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics.
    4. Ajay Mahal & Lainie Sutton, 2014. "Economic prosperity and non-communicable disease: understanding the linkages," Chapters, in: Raghbendra Jha & Raghav Gaiha & Anil B. Deolalikar (ed.), Handbook on Food, chapter 12, pages 278-324, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Jui-Kun Chiang & Yee-Hsin Kao & Ning-Sheng Lai, 2015. "The Impact of Hospice Care on Survival and Healthcare Costs for Patients with Lung Cancer: A National Longitudinal Population-Based Study in Taiwan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Poon, Charlotte & Haderi, Artes & Roediger, Alexander & Yuan, Megan, 2022. "Should we screen for lung cancer? A 10-country analysis identifying key decision-making factors," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 879-888.
    7. Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy & Kupek, Emil & Petrou, Stavros, 2015. "Self-reported health and socio-economic inequalities in England, 1996–2009: Repeated national cross-sectional study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 135-146.
    8. Klaas H J Ultee & Elke K M Tjeertes & Frederico Bastos Gonçalves & Ellen V Rouwet & Anton G M Hoofwijk & Robert Jan Stolker & Hence J M Verhagen & Sanne E Hoeks, 2018. "The relation between household income and surgical outcome in the Dutch setting of equal access to and provision of healthcare," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cancer; inequalities; European Union; Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan; HPV; screening; biomarkers; medicines; right to be forgotten; EU; health economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:ihewps:2024_001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Annette Persson Dietmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ihe.se/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.