Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10
A study of client satisfaction with postnatal care was conducted to ascertain the extent to which a program for the early discharge of obstetric patients meets its clients' needs. Women who were eligible for early discharge were surveyed at the end of their period of postnatal care. Satisfaction with care was compared for women choosing hospital and home postnatal care. While most of the women in both groups were satisfied with their postnatal care, those who chose early discharge with home postnatal care were more likely to give extremely positive responses to questions in all dimensions of postnatal care. The difference in satisfaction with the quality of postnatal care between the two groups of women was most apparent for the process of care and less so for the outcome of care. The study results indicate that the early discharge program provides a valuable option for the care of women in the postnatal period.
|Date of creation:||Oct 1992|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +61 2 9514 9799
Fax: 61 2 9514 4730
Web page: http://www.chere.uts.edu.au
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Gavin Mooney & Marion Haas & Rosalie Viney & Lyn Cooper, 1997. "Linking health outcomes to priority setting, planning and resource allocation - Report to the NSW Department of Health, CHERE Project Report No 1," Research Reports 1, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
- Anthony Scott & Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Madeleine King & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12," Discussion Papers 12, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liz Chinchen)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.