IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/her/chedps/12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Scott
  • Sue Cameron
  • Patsy Kenny

    (CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney)

  • Madeleine King
  • Alan Shiell

Abstract

Obstetric early discharge provides an alternative to conventional, hospital based, postnatal care. Clients are discharged around two days earlier than usual and followed up at home by a midwife for up to seven days after delivery. Although previous evidence has shown that health status is at least equivalent in both alternatives, clients have an increased choice of their location of postnatal care. The primary objective of the economic evaluation is to estimate the net economic value of resources released due to the early discharge scheme in operation at three hospitals in Western Sydney. At current levels of activity the early discharge schemes at Blacktown and Westmead Hospitals use more hospital resources than they release. The Auburn early discharge scheme is the only one which releases resources in excess of the cost of domiciliary midwifery care, but this result is extremely sensitive to changes in key assumptions used in the analysis. Strategies which may improve the cost-effectiveness of each early discharge scheme are examined. The results also show that the burden of care has shifted to the community for all three schemes. When client and community related resource use is included in the results all three schemes consume more resources than they release. The ability of all three schemes to release resources may be eroded if lengths of conventional postnatal stay continue to fall in the future. This may also affect health outcomes if women are sent home early without midwifery support. Further research should be carried out on the effects on maternal and infant health status, not only of the declining trend in length of stay, but also of the number of postnatal visits received by each early discharge client. The study results indicate that even if early discharge schemes release resources greater than the cost of domiciliary midwifery care, it does not guarantee reductions in hospital expenditure. This depends on the alternative use to which the released resources are directed. Obstetric early discharge schemes provide clients with greater choice, and are likely to improve the quality of postnatal care. The main issue for decision makers is whether increased client choice is worth the extra cost of the domiciliary midwifery program.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Scott & Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Madeleine King & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12," Discussion Papers 12, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:her:chedps:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chere.uts.edu.au/pdf/dp12.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1992
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Tony Scott & Madeleine King, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - reasons for non-participation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 11," Discussion Papers 11, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. S Cleland & Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - overview, CHERE Discussion Paper No 9," Discussion Papers 9, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    3. Patsy Kenny & Sue Cameron & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10," Discussion Papers 10, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patsy Kenny & Sue Cameron & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10," Discussion Papers 10, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Tony Scott & Madeleine King, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - reasons for non-participation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 11," Discussion Papers 11, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Tony Scott & Madeleine King, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - reasons for non-participation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 11," Discussion Papers 11, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Patsy Kenny & Sue Cameron & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10," Discussion Papers 10, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic evaluation; obstetric early discharge;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liz Chinchen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chusyau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.