IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/her/chedps/11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - reasons for non-participation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 11

Author

Listed:
  • Sue Cameron
  • Patsy Kenny

    (CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney)

  • Tony Scott
  • Madeleine King

Abstract

An Early Discharge Program (EDP) for medically uncomplicated obstetrics patients operates from three hospitals in Sydney's western suburbs, Westmead Hospital, a large teaching hospital, and Auburn and Blacktown, which are smaller district hospitals. The patients are discharged home between 6 and 48 hours after delivery and visited in the home by midwives for up to 7 days after birth. This program is funded under the Medicare Incentive Package, one of the objectives of which is to facilitate the development of less costly alternatives to acute hospital care. An economic analysis and evaluation of the EDP was carried out at the same time as this study, to examine the net economic value of resources released due to the EDP. As a considerable proportion of obstetric patients who are eligible for this program decline to take it up, this study investigated the reasons these women had for choosing to remain longer in hospital, rather than going home early with domiciliary midwifery support. On the day before discharge, the patients were asked to complete a self administered questionnaire, giving their reasons for refusing the EDP, an assessment of the costs incurred by their stay in hospital to themselves and their visitors, and their satisfaction with the post natal care received. This study showed an apparent lack of awareness and information about the EDP among the patients, particularly those with non-English speaking backgrounds. It also showed that a substantial proportion of the women had no help at all with housework and child care and would have used EDP if more home help was available. One outstanding characteristic which distinguished EDP participants and non-participants was parity. A higher proportion of women who chose not to take early discharge were first time mothers. This reflected their lack of confidence, experience and information about baby care and possibly their low expectations of postnatal health. In order to increase participation rates in EDP this report recommends that: fuller information and educational programs be used to raise awareness of EDP; there be an increased availability of home help; and a "hot line" be set up providing women with instant access to advice. It also suggests a single day reduction in length of hospital stay instead of the usual 2 or 3 days required by this EDP.

Suggested Citation

  • Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Tony Scott & Madeleine King, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - reasons for non-participation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 11," Discussion Papers 11, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:her:chedps:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chere.uts.edu.au/pdf/dp11.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1992
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Scott & Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Madeleine King & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12," Discussion Papers 12, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. S Cleland & Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - overview, CHERE Discussion Paper No 9," Discussion Papers 9, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    3. Patsy Kenny & Sue Cameron & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10," Discussion Papers 10, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patsy Kenny & Sue Cameron & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10," Discussion Papers 10, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Anthony Scott & Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Madeleine King & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12," Discussion Papers 12, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony Scott & Sue Cameron & Patsy Kenny & Madeleine King & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - economic evaluation, CHERE Discussion Paper No 12," Discussion Papers 12, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Patsy Kenny & Sue Cameron & Madeleine King & Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1992. "Evaluation of obstetric early discharge - client satisfaction, CHERE Discussion Paper No 10," Discussion Papers 10, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Obstetric early discharge; non-participation;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liz Chinchen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chusyau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.