IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hdl/wpaper/2111.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Delivering on the European Pillar of Social Rights: Towards a needs-oriented distribution of the social funds?

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Hermans;
  • Johanna Greiss;
  • Heleen Delanghe;
  • Bea Cantillon;

Abstract

The European Social Fund (ESF) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) are instruments by which the European Union (EU) acts as a ‘material supporter’ of national welfare states. Originally, these funds served social objectives only in a derived form. Today, however, the merger European Social Fund Plus (ESF+), integrating both ESF and FEAD, is presented as the main instrument to implement the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR). This raises the question of what these levers can do in terms of financial support, especially for Member States with greater social needs. In this paper, using the Social Scoreboard indicators that monitor the EPSR implementation, we analyse the size and the distribution of ESF and FEAD allocations according to Member States’ economic capacity, social needs, policy outcomes and efforts required to meet the European social goals. We find that the funds benefit relatively more the poorer Member States who also tend to have greater social needs. However, especially in the case of ESF, there are significant deviations from this general pattern. Some countries consistently receive less funding than others with similar levels of social needs, and vice versa. Moreover, if we express ESF and FEAD budgets as a percentage of the efforts required to lift all income-poor citizens to the European 60% poverty line, it appears that countries who need to make the greatest efforts get relatively less funding. This outcome seems to be significantly driven by the funds’ allocation rules, which give only little importance to the great social discrepancies between countries. Ultimately, this raises the question whether social needs should be taken more into account in the distribution of the funds, while paying attention to the risk of moral hazard.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Hermans; & Johanna Greiss; & Heleen Delanghe; & Bea Cantillon;, 2021. "Delivering on the European Pillar of Social Rights: Towards a needs-oriented distribution of the social funds?," Working Papers 2111, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
  • Handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/files/57001/3f250123-f818-4b62-9688-4110d8eb2861.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Ugo Fratesi & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2020. "Back to the member states? Cohesion Policy and the national challenges to the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 5-9, January.
    2. Cristian Incaltarau & Gabriela Carmen Pascariu & Neculai‐Cristian Surubaru, 2020. "Evaluating the Determinants of EU Funds Absorption across Old and New Member States – the Role of Administrative Capacity and Political Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 941-961, July.
    3. Magdalena Bernaciak, 2014. "Social dumping and the EU integration process," Working Papers 11091, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).
    4. Bea Cantillon, 2019. "The European Pillar of Social Rights: ten arguments for prioritising principle 14 on minimum incomes," Working Papers 1902, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sümeyra Akarçeşme & Ane Aranguiz; & Anna Lemmens; & Bea Cantillon;, 2023. "Reaching the European 2030 poverty target: The imperative for balancing the EU Social Agenda," Working Papers 2311, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Di Caro & Ugo Fratesi, 2022. "One policy, different effects: Estimating the region‐specific impacts of EU cohesion policy," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 307-330, January.
    2. Martina Vukašina & Ines Kersan-Škabiæ & Edvard Orliæ, 2022. "Impact of European structural and investment funds absorption on the regional development in the EU–12 (new member states)," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 857-880, December.
    3. Panagiotis KOUDOUMAKIS & George BOTZORIS & Angelos PROTOPAPAS, 2021. "The Contribution Of Cohesion Policy To The Development And Convergence Of The Regions Of The European Union," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 277-290, June.
    4. Piotr Żuk & Paweł Żuk, 2018. "Offshoring, labour migration and neo-liberalisation: nationalist responses and alternatives in Eastern Europe," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(1), pages 97-117, March.
    5. Di Stefano, Roberta & Resce, Giuliano, "undated". "The Determinants of Missed Funding: Predicting the Paradox of Increased Need and Reduced Allocation," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp23092, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    6. Cezar TECLEAN & Gabriela DRAGAN, 2023. "Consultative Dimension In The European Union'S Multi-Level Governance Process: A Lever For Regulatory And Institutional Resilience," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(1), pages 48-57, April.
    7. Adelar Fochezatto & Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet & Patricia Batistela & Rodrigo Valdes, 2023. "Income Leakage Regional Effects: Supply and Demand Shocks during the Pandemic in Brazil and Chile," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Giua, Mara & Sonzogno, Giulia Valeria, 2021. "Mind the Covid-19 crisis: An evidence-based implementation of Next Generation EU," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 278-297.
    9. Ionela Gavrila-Paven, 2021. "Results And Perspectives In Implementing Regional Operational Program," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 308-316, July.
    10. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Di Cataldo, Marco & Monastiriotis, Vassilis, 2020. "How ‘smart’ are Smart Specialisation strategies?," CEPR Discussion Papers 15442, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Carlos San Juan Mesonada & Carlos Sunyer Manteiga, 2020. "European Structural and Investment Funds and Regional Convergence: The Impact of Public Deficit in Beta-Convergence," EconPol Working Paper 47, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    12. Seeliger, Martin, 2018. "Die soziale Konstruktion internationaler Solidarität. Gewerkschaftspolitische Positionsbildung im Bereich der Dienstleistungsfreiheit [The social construction of international solidarity. Trade uni," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(4), pages 425-445.
    13. Marco Di Cotaldo & Vassilis Monastiriotis & Andres Rodriguez-Pose, 2020. "Populism Amidst Prosperity: How ‘smart’ are Smart Specialisation strategies?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 162, European Institute, LSE.
    14. María-José Solís-Baltodano & José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Josep E. Peris, 2022. "Distributing the European structural and investment funds from a conflicting claims approach [Verteilung der europäischen Struktur- und Investitionsfonds aus einem kollidierenden Forderung Ansatz]," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 42(1), pages 23-47, April.
    15. Sharon Baute & Bart Meuleman & Koen Abts & Marc Swyngedouw, 2018. "European integration as a threat to social security: Another source of Euroscepticism?," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(2), pages 209-232, June.
    16. Eirini Aivazidou & Giovanni Cunico & Edoardo Mollona, 2020. "Beyond the EU Structural Funds’ Absorption Rate: How Do Regions Really Perform?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Vytautas Kuokštis & Ringailė Kuokštytė, 2023. "How Institutions Moderated the Pandemic's Economic Impact in EU Member States," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 503-525, March.
    18. Rafael Munoz de Bustillo Llorente, 2019. "Key challenges for the European Welfare States," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-04, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Florin Alexandru Roman & Monica Violeta Achim & Robert W. McGee, 2023. "Fraud related to EU funds. The case of Romania," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 8(14), pages 120-142, May.
    20. Marco Di Cataldo & Vassilis Monastiriotis & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2022. "How ‘Smart’ Are Smart Specialization Strategies?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1272-1298, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Santiago Burone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csbuabe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.