IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-01710083.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prospective pour un financement durable des transports publics urbains. Rapport final

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Faivre d'Arcier

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Le PREDIT a souhaité engager une démarche prospective sur l'évolution du besoin de financement public pour les réseaux de transports publics urbains. Le constat fait ces dernières années montre que les efforts de développement de l'offre se traduisent par une tendance à la dégradation de la situation financière des réseaux. Cette situation pose le problème de la pérennité du financement des transports publics urbains, alors même que les contraintes environnementales et énergétiques imposent de réduire l'usage de l'automobile en ville. Peut-on dès lors estimer à un horizon de 10 ans quelle pourrait être l'évolution de la contribution publique nécessaire au bon fonctionnement des réseaux ? Comment peut-on remédier à la dérive des déficits d'exploitation ? Faut-il nécessairement rechercher de nouvelles sources de financement pour soulager la contribution des collectivités ? Ce rapport résulte d'un travail collectif de chercheurs, articulant une réflexion en séminaire, des auditions d'acteurs et une enquête auprès de quelques autorités organisatrices françaises et européennes. Centré sur la maîtrise du « coût public », il cherche très librement à exposer des stratégies d'action portant à la fois sur les politiques mises en œuvre, les niveaux de service offert, le coût de ces services et les contributions des diverses catégories d'acteurs à leur financement.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Faivre d'Arcier, 2008. "Prospective pour un financement durable des transports publics urbains. Rapport final," Working Papers halshs-01710083, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01710083
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01710083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01710083/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van de Velde, D. M., 1999. "Organisational forms and entrepreneurship in public transport: classifying organisational forms," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 147-157, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Stanley, 2011. "Public Transport Liberalization: Achievements and Future Directions," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. McTigue, Clare & Monios, Jason & Rye, Tom, 2020. "The principal-agent problem in contracting public transport provision to private operators: A case study of the UK Quality Contract Scheme," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Ryzhkov, Alexander & Sarzhan, Yuliya, 2020. "Market initiative and central planning: A study of the Moscow bus network," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Hensher, David A., 2007. "Bus transport: Economics, policy and planning," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-507, January.
    5. Andrea ZATTI, 2012. "New Organizational Models In European Local Public Transport: From Myth To Reality," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(4), pages 533-559, December.
    6. Carlo Vittorio FIORIO & Massimo FLORIO & Giovanni PERUCCA, 2011. "Consumers’ satisfaction and regulation of local public transport: evidence from European cities," Departmental Working Papers 2011-26, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    7. Bray, David & Wallis, Ian, 2008. "Adelaide bus service reform: Impacts, achievements and lessons," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 126-136, January.
    8. Gwilliam, Ken, 2008. "A review of issues in transit economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-22, January.
    9. Didier van de Velde, 2013. "Long-distance coach services in Europe," Chapters, in: Mattias Finger & Torben Holvad (ed.), Regulating Transport in Europe, chapter 5, pages 115-139, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Rosário Macário, 2013. "Urban public transport," Chapters, in: Mattias Finger & Torben Holvad (ed.), Regulating Transport in Europe, chapter 6, pages 140-168, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. William Roy & Anne Yvrande-Billon, 2007. "Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00107375, HAL.
    12. Veeneman, Wijnand, 2010. "Changing public transport governance in Dutch metropoles: To tender or not to tender," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 195-203.
    13. Babalık-Sutcliffe, Ela, 2016. "Urban rail operators in Turkey: Organisational reform in transit service provision and the impact on planning, operation and system performance," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 464-475.
    14. Fiorio, Carlo V. & Florio, Massimo & Perucca, Giovanni, 2013. "User satisfaction and the organization of local public transport: Evidence from European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 209-218.
    15. Yves Croissant & William Roy & Joan Canton, 2013. "Reducing urban public transport costs by tendering lots: a panel data estimation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(26), pages 3711-3722, September.
    16. Mouwen, Arnoud & Rietveld, Piet, 2013. "Does competitive tendering improve customer satisfaction with public transport? A case study for the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 29-45.
    17. David A. Hensher & Olav Hauge, 2002. "Competition and ownership in land passenger transport: The 7th International Conference," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 335-370, January.
    18. Stanley, John & Smith, Andrew, 2013. "Workshop 3A: Governance, contracting, ownership and competition issues in public transport: Looking up not down," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 167-174.
    19. Nathalie Louit-Martinod & Cécile Chanut-Guieu & Cathel Kornig & Philippe Méhaut, 2016. "“A plus Dans le Busâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, February.
    20. Odeck, James & Bray, David, 2008. "Analytical and institutional methods and frameworks," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 41-44, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01710083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.