IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05346673.html

Sustainable services in the era of Society 5.0: Revisiting weak and strong sustainability
[Services durables à l'ère de la Société 5.0 : un réexamen sous l'angle de la durabilité faible et forte]

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Kervio

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Magali Dubosson

    (HES-SO - Haute Ecole Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale)

  • Christophe Schmitt

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

This paper proposes a renewed understanding of sustainability for services within the framework of Society 5.0. While sustainable services have long been defined by the Triple Bottom Line approach, i.e. simultaneously addressing economic, social, and environmental dimensions, this paradigm often neglects the transformative impact of digital technologies on service ecosystems. Building on an extensive literature review, we conceptualize sustainability as a dynamic, multi-dimensional construct shaped by emerging socio-technical systems. We integrate Service-Dominant Logic (SDL) and the IHIP characteristics of services to highlight how intangibility, co-creation, and relational dynamics uniquely position services to foster sustainable value. Our analysis distinguishes between weak sustainability, which relies on technological substitution to mitigate environmental degradation, and strong sustainability, which embeds ecological limits and human well-being at the core of service design. Within Society 5.0, advanced technologies such as AI, IoT, and cyber-physical systems offer opportunities to optimize resource use, enhance social inclusion, and regenerate ecosystems. However, true sustainability requires systemic changes in values and governance, challenging growth-oriented paradigms. We develop a conceptual framework that bridges ecological economics and service research, showing how services can evolve into human-centered, technologically enabled ecosystems that harmonize economic viability, social equity, and environmental resilience. This work contributes to advancing sustainable service theory by offering an integrative, future-oriented perspective that aligns digital transformation with strong sustainability principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Kervio & Magali Dubosson & Christophe Schmitt, 2025. "Sustainable services in the era of Society 5.0: Revisiting weak and strong sustainability [Services durables à l'ère de la Société 5.0 : un réexamen sous l'angle de la durabilité faible et forte]," Post-Print hal-05346673, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05346673
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05346673v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05346673v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herman E. Daly, 1972. "In Defense of a Steady-State Economy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(5), pages 945-954.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xhulia Likaj & Michael Jacobs & Thomas Fricke, 2022. "Growth, Degrowth or Post-growth? Towards a synthetic understanding of the growth debate," Basic Papers 2, Forum New Economy.
    2. Joshua Henkel & Georg Schwesinger, 2020. "Establishing Sustainable Consumption - How Future Policies Can Channel Consumer Preferences," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2007, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    3. Mark G. Edwards, 2021. "The growth paradox, sustainable development, and business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3079-3094, November.
    4. repec:sae:envval:v:27:y:2018:i:1:p:9-27 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    6. Larch, Mario & Löning, Markus & Wanner, Joschka, 2018. "Can degrowth overcome the leakage problem of unilateral climate policy?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 118-130.
    7. Tim Jackson & Peter Victor & Asjad Naqvi, 2016. "Towards a Stock-Flow Consistent Ecological Macroeconomics. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 114," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58788, October.
    8. Naudé, Wim, 2024. "Entrepreneurship Is Dangerously Obsessed with Growth and Incompatible with Current Visions of a Post-growth Society," IZA Discussion Papers 17158, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Spash, Clive L., 2019. "Making Pollution into a Market Failure Rather Than a Cost-Shifting Success: The Suppression of Revolutionary Change in Economics," SRE-Discussion Papers 2019/06, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Alessandro De Matteis, 2019. "Decomposing the anthropogenic causes of climate change," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 165-179, February.
    11. Spash, Clive L., 2019. "Time for a Paradigm Shift: From Economic Growth andPrice-Making Markets to Social Ecological Economics," SRE-Discussion Papers 2019/07, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. Alfonso Rodriguez-Dono & Antoni Hernández-Fernández, 2021. "Fostering Sustainability and Critical Thinking through Debate—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Zisopoulos, Filippos K. & Fath, Brian D. & de Oliveira, Bruno Meirelles & Toboso-Chavero, Susana & D'Assenza-David, Hugo & de Souza, Vitor Miranda & Huang, Hao & Scrieciu, Şerban & Clark, O. Grant & N, 2025. "Towards an ecological metaphor for regenerative circular economies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Schmelzer, Matthias, 2015. "The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 262-271.
    15. Tim Jackson & Ben Drake & Peter Victor & Kurt Kratena & Mark Sommer, 2014. "Foundations for an Ecological Macroeconomics. Literature Review and Model Development. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 65," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47497, October.
    16. Sinan Erdogan & Guray Akalin & Daniel Balsalobre‐Lorente, 2025. "Paving the Road for Sustainable Development in Nordic Countries: Do Green Investments Make Difference?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 5504-5517, August.
    17. Rätzer, Matthias & Hartz, Ronald & Winkler, Ingo, 2018. "Editorial: Post-Growth Organizations," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 29(3), pages 193-205.
    18. Spash, Clive L., 2020. "A tale of three paradigms: Realising the revolutionary potential of ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Theodore P. Lianos & Anastasia Pseiridis & Nicholas Tsounis, 2023. "Declining population and GDP growth," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Clive L. Spash, 2015. "The Future Post-Growth Society," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(2), pages 366-380, March.
    21. Jackson, Tim & Victor, Peter A., 2016. "Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 206-219.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05346673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.