IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04821310.html

Adjusting Manual Rates to Own Experience: Comparing the Credibility Approach to Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio Alfredo Spedicato

    (Leitha SRL)

  • Christophe Dutang

    (ASAR - Applied Statistics And Reliability - ASAR - LJK - Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Quentin Guibert

    (CEREMADE - CEntre de REcherches en MAthématiques de la DEcision - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, LSAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Credibility theory is the usual framework in actuarial science when it comes to reinforcing individual experience by transfering rates estimated from collective information. Based on the paradigm of transfer learning, this article presents the idea that a machine learning (ML) model pre-trained using a rich market data porfolio can improve the prediction of rates for an individual insurance portfolio. This framework consists first in training several ML models on a market portfolio of insurance data. Pre-trained models provide valuable information on relations between features and predicted rates. Furthermore, features shared with the company dataset are used to predict rates better than the same ML models trained on the insurer's dataset alone. Our approach is illustrated with classical ML models on an anonymized dataset including both market data and data from an European non-life insurance company, and is compared with a hierarchical Bühlmann-Straub credibility model. We observe the transfert learning stragegy combining company data with external market data significantly improves the prediction accuracy compared to a ML model only trained on the insurer's data and provides competitive results compared to hierarchical credibility models.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio Alfredo Spedicato & Christophe Dutang & Quentin Guibert, 2025. "Adjusting Manual Rates to Own Experience: Comparing the Credibility Approach to Machine Learning," Post-Print hal-04821310, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04821310
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04821310v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04821310v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio, Katrien & Beirlant, Jan, 2007. "Actuarial statistics with generalized linear mixed models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 58-76, January.
    2. Dutang, Christophe & Goulet, Vincent & Pigeon, Mathieu, 2008. "actuar: An R Package for Actuarial Science," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 25(i07).
    3. Richman, Ronald, 2021. "AI in actuarial science – a review of recent advances – part 2," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 230-258, July.
    4. Cary Chi-Liang Tsai & Ying Zhang, 2019. "A multi-dimensional Bühlmann credibility approach to modeling multi-population mortality rates," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2019(5), pages 406-431, May.
    5. Andrea Nigri & Susanna Levantesi & Mario Marino & Salvatore Scognamiglio & Francesca Perla, 2019. "A Deep Learning Integrated Lee–Carter Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Hong Li & Yang Lu, 2018. "A Bayesian non-parametric model for small population mortality," Post-Print hal-02419000, HAL.
    7. Hong Li & Yang Lu, 2018. "A Bayesian non-parametric model for small population mortality," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2018(7), pages 605-628, August.
    8. Vincent Goulet & Christophe Dutang & Mathieu Pigeon, 2008. "actuar : An R Package for Actuarial Science," Post-Print hal-01616144, HAL.
    9. Richman, Ronald, 2021. "AI in actuarial science – a review of recent advances – part 1," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 207-229, July.
    10. Apostolos Bozikas & Georgios Pitselis, 2019. "Credible Regression Approaches to Forecast Mortality for Populations with Limited Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung-Tsung Hsiao & Chou-Wen Wang & I.-Chien Liu & Ko-Lun Kung, 2024. "Mortality improvement neural-network models with autoregressive effects," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 49(2), pages 363-383, April.
    2. Yang Qiao & Chou-Wen Wang & Wenjun Zhu, 2024. "Machine learning in long-term mortality forecasting," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 49(2), pages 340-362, April.
    3. Benjamin Avanzi & Greg Taylor & Melantha Wang & Bernard Wong, 2023. "Machine Learning with High-Cardinality Categorical Features in Actuarial Applications," Papers 2301.12710, arXiv.org.
    4. repec:jss:jstsof:35:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Li, Li & Li, Han & Panagiotelis, Anastasios, 2025. "Boosting domain-specific models with shrinkage: An application in mortality forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 191-207.
    6. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wang, Melantha & Wong, Bernard, 2021. "SynthETIC: An individual insurance claim simulator with feature control," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 296-308.
    7. Anna Castañer & M.Mercè Claramunt & Maite Mármol, 2014. "Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2014/310, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    8. K. G. Reddy & M. G. M. Khan, 2020. "stratifyR: An R Package for optimal stratification and sample allocation for univariate populations," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 62(3), pages 383-405, September.
    9. Taiane Schaedler Prass & Guilherme Pumi & Cleiton Guollo Taufemback & Jonas Hendler Carlos, 2025. "Positive time series regression models: theoretical and computational aspects," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1185-1215, March.
    10. Freek Holvoet & Christopher Blier-Wong & Katrien Antonio, 2025. "A multi-view contrastive learning framework for spatial embeddings in risk modelling," Papers 2511.17954, arXiv.org.
    11. Denuit, Michel, 2019. "Size-biased transform and conditional mean risk sharing, with application to P2P insurance and tontines," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019010, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. Aleksandar Arandjelovi'c & Julia Eisenberg, 2024. "Optimal risk mitigation by deep reinsurance," Papers 2408.06168, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    13. Michael Grabchak, 2022. "Discrete Tempered Stable Distributions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1877-1890, September.
    14. Prieto, F. & García-García, C.B. & Salmerón-Gómez, R., 2025. "Modelling global fossil CO2 emissions with a lognormal distribution," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. Jamotton, Charlotte & Hainaut, Donatien, 2024. "Latent Dirichlet Allocation for structured insurance data," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2024008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    16. Diego Zappa & Gian Paolo Clemente & Francesco Della Corte & Nino Savelli, 2023. "Editorial on the Special Issue on Insurance: complexity, risks and its connection with social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 125-130, December.
    17. Zhu, Felix & Dong, Yumo & Huang, Fei, 2025. "Data-rich economic forecasting for actuarial applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Jian Wang & Cielito C. Reyes-Gibby & Sanjay Shete, 2021. "An Approach to Analyze Longitudinal Zero-Inflated Microbiome Count Data Using Two-Stage Mixed Effects Models," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 13(2), pages 267-290, July.
    19. Katrien Antonio & Christophe Dutang & Andreas Tsanakas, 2021. "Editorial," Post-Print hal-04748464, HAL.
    20. Denuit, Michel, 2019. "Investing in your own and peers' risks: The simple analytics of p2p insurance," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019028, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    21. Jaiswal, Rachana & Gupta, Shashank & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2024. "Big data and machine learning-based decision support system to reshape the vaticination of insurance claims," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04821310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.