IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04289632.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

AC²TION project: Multicriteria analysis for decision support to evaluate the performance of new agroforestry systems in field crops
[Projet AC²TION : Analyse multicritère pour l’aide à la décision afin d’évaluer les performances de nouveaux systèmes agroforestiers en grandes cultures]

Author

Listed:
  • Odile Phelpin

    (UR ETTIS - Environnement, territoires en transition, infrastructures, sociétés - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Francis Macary

    (UR ETTIS - Environnement, territoires en transition, infrastructures, sociétés - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Laurence Denaix

    (UMR ISPA - Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère - Bordeaux Sciences Agro - Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

The TETRAE project "Accelerating and Accompanying Transitions: Contributions and Impacts of Agroforestry in New Aquitaine" (AC²TION), aims to study the environmental and socio-economic performance of agroforestry systems (association of trees and crops on the same agricultural plot) in south-western France. As part of research component 3 of the TETRAE AC²TION project, we propose to present the methodological approach used to assess the environmental and socio-economic performance of field crop agroforestry systems at farm level in the Charentes region, using a multi-criteria decision-support method. By storing carbon, supporting a rich biological life in the soil and sheltering auxiliary insects in the canopy, trees play an active role in erosion control and soil conservation. Tree rows also play an important role as windbreaks and barriers to the atmospheric diffusion of pesticides. Trees create a habitat for crop pest beneficials, especially in areas where hedges and copses have long since disappeared. They can also act as a reservoir for fungal and bacterial pathogens. They also make the rural landscape a pleasant place to live. Agroforestry is therefore one of the levers that can support the agroecological transition to mitigate the effects of climate change, facilitate the implementation of other agroecological practices and provide ecological functionalities. The originality of our approach is twofold: 1) relatively few studies and applications have been carried out in New Aquitaine, in comparison with other regions such as Montpellier 2) at the heart of our questioning are the quantitative and qualitative decision levers and obstacles of agroforestry farmers in field crops. We propose to identify and classify their positive or deleterious effects, integrating them into an analysis of overall performance (environmental and socio-economic). Our methodological approach involves surveys and interviews with field crop agroforestry farmers, and analysis of the survey results, identifying the socio-economic and environmental decision factors involved in the transition. We will then use multi-criteria decision-support methods: Electre Tri-nC and Electre III to evaluate agroforestry performance. Qualitative and quantitative criteria will be used to understand the impact of such a system on microclimate and biodiversity. The same applies to soil enrichment for mineral plant nutrition, and positive externalities for humans. But agroforestry should also help reduce crop pathogens, with a view to reducing pesticide use. Anchored in the regional fabric of the Neo-Aquitaine region, the project is part of a strong partnership approach, with the French Agroforestry Association providing co-leadership. The Chambers of Agriculture of Charente Maritime and the Interdepartmental Chamber of Agriculture of Deux Sèvres and Charente-Maritime are also partners, as are several farmers. Our contribution to the project is also in collaboration with various arable and agroforestry farmers, based mainly in the Charentes region. Identification and classification of socio-economic and environmental decision criteria for the overall performance of field crop agroforestry farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Odile Phelpin & Francis Macary & Laurence Denaix, 2023. "AC²TION project: Multicriteria analysis for decision support to evaluate the performance of new agroforestry systems in field crops [Projet AC²TION : Analyse multicritère pour l’aide à la décision ," Post-Print hal-04289632, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04289632
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04289632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04289632/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Almeida-Dias, J. & Figueira, J.R. & Roy, B., 2010. "Electre Tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 565-580, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Fernández & José Rui Figueira & Jorge Navarro, 2023. "A theoretical look at ordinal classification methods based on comparing actions with limiting boundaries between adjacent classes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 819-843, June.
    2. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Fernández, Eduardo & Figueira, José Rui & Navarro, Jorge & Solares, Efrain, 2022. "Handling imperfect information in multiple criteria decision-making through a comprehensive interval outranking approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    4. Hu, Qiwei & Chakhar, Salem & Siraj, Sajid & Labib, Ashraf, 2017. "Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1136-1163.
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    6. Murat Köksalan & Vincent Mousseau & Selin Özpeynirci, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Sorting with Category Size Restrictions," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 5-23, January.
    7. Fernández, Eduardo & Figueira, José Rui & Navarro, Jorge & Solares, Efrain, 2023. "A generalized approach to ordinal classification based on the comparison of actions with either limiting or characteristic profiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1309-1322.
    8. Barbati, M. & Figueira, J.R. & Greco, S. & Ishizaka, A. & Panaro, S., 2023. "A multiple criteria methodology for priority based portfolio selection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Fernández, Eduardo & Navarro, Jorge & Solares, Efrain, 2022. "A hierarchical interval outranking approach with interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 293-307.
    10. Khaled Belahcène & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Marc Pirlot & Olivier Sobrie, 2023. "Multiple criteria sorting models and methods—Part I: survey of the literature," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-46, March.
    11. Tlili, Ali & Belahcène, Khaled & Khaled, Oumaima & Mousseau, Vincent & Ouerdane, Wassila, 2022. "Learning non-compensatory sorting models using efficient SAT/MaxSAT formulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 979-1006.
    12. Arandarenko, Mihail & Corrente, Salvatore & Jandrić, Maja & Stamenković, Mladen, 2020. "Multiple criteria decision aiding as a prediction tool for migration potential of regions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1154-1166.
    13. Vincent Mousseau & Özgür Özpeynirci & Selin Özpeynirci, 2018. "Inverse multiple criteria sorting problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 379-412, August.
    14. Rocha, António & Costa, Ana Sara & Figueira, José Rui & Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Quality assessment of the Portuguese public hospitals: A multiple criteria approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Pelissari, Renata & Oliveira, Maria Célia & Ben Amor, Sarah & Abackerli, Alvaro José, 2019. "A new FlowSort-based method to deal with information imperfections in sorting decision-making problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 235-246.
    16. Chakhar, Salem & Ishizaka, Alessio & Labib, Ashraf & Saad, Inès, 2016. "Dominance-based rough set approach for group decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 206-224.
    17. Bernard Roy & Roman Slowinski, 2013. "Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method," Post-Print hal-00874292, HAL.
    18. Dias, Luis C. & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Dantas, Guilherme & de Castro, Nivalde & Zamboni, Lucca, 2018. "A multi-criteria approach to sort and rank policies based on Delphi qualitative assessments and ELECTRE TRI: The case of smart grids in Brazil," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 100-111.
    19. Arcidiacono, Sally Giuseppe & Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore, 2021. "Robust stochastic sorting with interacting criteria hierarchically structured," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 735-754.
    20. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant, 2013. "Some remarks on ELECTRE TRI," Working Papers hal-00942310, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04289632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.