IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03680604.html

Does Ethics Improve Stock Market Resilience in Times of Instability?

Author

Listed:
  • E. Erragragui

  • M.K. Hassan
  • Jonathan Peillex

    (CRIISEA - Centre de Recherche sur les Institutions, l'Industrie et les Systèmes Économiques d'Amiens - UR UPJV 3908 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

  • A.N.F. Khan

Abstract

This paper compares the resilience of ethical (Islamic and socially responsible) indexes among five developed (US, UK, Japan, Canada, Australia) and three emerging markets (Brazil, India, South Africa) during the period following the 2008 subprime crisis. It relies on a multivariate CAPM-EGARCH model that accounts for sudden changes in volatility through the application of an iterated cumulative sums of squares (ICSS) algorithm on daily data over the sample period 2008\textendash 2014 to model time-varying volatility and ensure reliable estimates. The study confirms the lower systemic risk associated with Islamic indexes during the bearish period and reports that SRI, despite being more subject to systemic risk, offered higher alphas in highly integrated markets, while Islamic indexes performed better in less integrated ones. The evidence also reveals a very limited increase in the models' predictability power from the integration of sudden changes in volatility into the EGARCH models during the full sample period. This limit is more marked during the bearish sub-period. Our findings have important implications for international investment and portfolio diversification perspectives in times of financial downturn. \textcopyright 2018 Elsevier B.V.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Erragragui & M.K. Hassan & Jonathan Peillex & A.N.F. Khan, 2018. "Does Ethics Improve Stock Market Resilience in Times of Instability?," Post-Print hal-03680604, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03680604
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gallucci, Carmen & Santulli, Rosalia & Lagasio, Valentina, 2022. "The conceptualization of environmental, social and governance risks in portfolio studies A systematic literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Schabek, Tomasz, 2020. "The financial performance of sustainable power producers in emerging markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1408-1419.
    3. Jonathan Peillex & Sabri Boubaker & Breeda Comyns, 2021. "Does It Pay to Invest in Japanese Women? Evidence from the MSCI Japan Empowering Women Index," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 595-613, May.
    4. Barda, Kelly, 2020. "Analyser la performance financière des indices boursiers environnementaux [Analyzing financial performance of green stock market indices]," MPRA Paper 102537, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Mendiela, Pauline, 2021. "Information security breaches and financial market reaction: the French case," MPRA Paper 105029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. mehagni, soheir, 2019. "Comités de savants islamiques [Islamic boards]," MPRA Paper 92863, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tatarnikova, Olga & Duchêne, Sébastien & Sentis, Patrick & Willinger, Marc, 2023. "Portfolio instability and socially responsible investment: Experiments with financial professionals and students," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Jasmina Ðuraškovic & Slavica Manic & Dejan Živkov, 2019. "Multiscale Volatility Transmission and Portfolio Construction Between the Baltic Stock Markets," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(2), pages 211-235, April.
    9. Peillex, Jonathan, 2022. "Comment expliquer la décision de création d’un fond éthique ? [What explain the creation of ethical funds?]," MPRA Paper 115067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Peillex, Jonathan, 2023. "Réaction des investisseurs à la création de fonds éthiques [Investor reaction to the creation of ethical funds]," MPRA Paper 118930, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Junqing Tang & Hans R. Heinimann, 2019. "Quantitative evaluation of consecutive resilience cycles in stock market performance: A systems-oriented approach," Papers 1903.03201, arXiv.org.
    12. Alexandra Huang, 2019. "Déterminants des encours nationaux socialement responsables : Une analyse exploratoire internationale," Working Papers hal-02242796, HAL.
    13. Ming-Lang Tseng & Phan Anh Tan & Shiou-Yun Jeng & Chun-Wei Remen Lin & Yeneneh Tamirat Negash & Susilo Nur Aji Cokro Darsono, 2019. "Sustainable Investment: Interrelated among Corporate Governance, Economic Performance and Market Risks Using Investor Preference Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Alexakis, Christos & Kenourgios, Dimitris & Pappas, Vasileios & Petropoulou, Athina, 2021. "From dotcom to Covid-19: A convergence analysis of Islamic investments," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Delâtre, Chloë, 2022. "Désinvestissement des combustibles fossiles: quelles conséquences pour la gestion de portefeuille ? [Fossil fuel divestment and portfolios implications]," MPRA Paper 114633, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ezzedine Ghlamallah & Laurence Gialdini & Sami Ben Larbi, 2025. "Integrating societal issues into the asset allocation and selection strategies of ethical funds: the case of socially responsible funds and Islamic funds," Post-Print hal-05232196, HAL.
    17. Md Hakim Ali & Md Akther Uddin & Md. Atiqur Rahman Khan & Blake Goud, 2021. "Faith‐based versus value‐based finance: Is there any portfolio diversification benefit between responsible and Islamic finance?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5570-5583, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03680604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.