IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02622869.html

Assessment of TFP change at provincial level in Vietnam: new evidence using Färe–Primont productivity index

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh Viet Nguyen

    (Vietnam National University)

  • Michel Simioni

    (UMR MOISA - Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

  • Dao Le Van

    (University of Economics and Business)

Abstract

Vietnam has become a lower middle-income country in less than 30 years, and is now facing the middle-income trap risk. Knowledge of changes in total factor productivity (TFP) is an essential element in assessing this risk. An in-depth analysis of the evolution of TFP and its determinants in Vietnam is presented in this paper. TFP evaluation uses a recently proposed multiplicative-complete economically ideal index, namely the Färe–Primont index, to evaluate TFP and to decompose it into its different components: technical change, pure technical, mix and scale efficiencies. TFP is computed at the provincial level over the 2010–2017 period. The results shows that estimated provincial TFP values are, on average, small whatever the considered year, but they have increased with an annual compound growth rate of 3.46%. Technical progress as measured by TFP* appears to be the main driver of TFP growth over the period, with an annual compound growth rate of 3.34%. The expansion of the production set under constant returns-to-scale, from which TFP* is measured, is guided by movements of Ho Chi Minh city. Accordingly, on average, overall productive efficiency stagnated, with an annual compound growth rate of 0.12%. Technical efficiency has also stagnated over the period with its annual compound growth rate -0.62%. The results imply that there has been an increasing gap between provinces in terms of the resource allocation efficiency. This evolution may have negative consequences on sustainable economic development and lead the country into the risk of middle income trap in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh Viet Nguyen & Michel Simioni & Dao Le Van, 2019. "Assessment of TFP change at provincial level in Vietnam: new evidence using Färe–Primont productivity index," Post-Print hal-02622869, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02622869
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2019.09.007
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02622869v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02622869v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2019.09.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen, Thanh Viet & Hoang, Nguyen Kim, 2024. "How economic policies and development impact marine fisheries: Lessons learned from a transitional economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Huynh, Linh & Hoang, Hien, 2021. "Technical Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Changes in Manufacturing Industries: Recent Advancements in Stochastic Frontier Model Approach," MPRA Paper 117621, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2022.
    3. Thai-Ha Le & Dao Le Van, 2024. "A Fresh Look at the Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth: New Evidence Using the Färe-Primont Productivity Index," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 49(4), pages 43-69.
    4. Wen, Jun & Hai, Hongbo & Zhang, Yan & Chen, Zehua & Li, Lingxiao, 2025. "Does digital transformation impact green total factor productivity? Evidence from national big data comprehensive pilot zones in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 2207-2221.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • B21 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Microeconomics
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02622869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.