IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02534085.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions

Author

Listed:
  • Karim Ben Slimane

    (IRSN - Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, REGARDS - Recherches en Économie Gestion AgroRessources Durabilité Santé- EA 6292 - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne - MSH-URCA - Maison des Sciences Humaines de Champagne-Ardenne - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne)

  • Damien Chaney

    (Département de marketing [ESC Troyes] - Groupe ESC Troyes en Champagne, REGARDS - Recherches en Économie Gestion AgroRessources Durabilité Santé- EA 6292 - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne - MSH-URCA - Maison des Sciences Humaines de Champagne-Ardenne - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne)

  • Ashlee Humphreys

    (Northwestern University [Evanston])

  • Bernard Leca

    (Pôle Finance Responsable - Rouen Business School - Rouen Business School)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Karim Ben Slimane & Damien Chaney & Ashlee Humphreys & Bernard Leca, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02534085, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02534085
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cherrier, Hélène & Türe, Meltem, 2022. "Blame work and the scapegoating mechanism in market status-quo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1207-1217.
    2. Wiart, Lucie & Özçağlar-Toulouse, Nil & Shaw, Deirdre, 2022. "Maintaining market legitimacy: A discursive-hegemonic perspective on meat," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 391-402.
    3. Christian H. Koch, 2020. "Brands as activists: The Oatly case," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 593-606, September.
    4. Shijiao Chen & Jing A. Zhang & Hongzhi Gao & Zhilin Yang & Damien Mather, 2022. "Trust Erosion During Industry-Wide Crises: The Central Role of Consumer Legitimacy Judgement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 95-116, January.
    5. Tierney, Kieran D. & Oswald Karpen, Ingo & Westberg, Kate, 2022. "Brand meaning and institutional work: The light and dark sides of service employee practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 244-256.
    6. Patel, Pankaj C. & Oghazi, Pejvak & Arunachalam, S., 2023. "Does consumer privacy act influence firm performance in the retail industry? Evidence from a US state-level law change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Valentin Clemens & Christopher Albert Sabel & Johann Nils Foege & Stephan Nüesch, 2022. "System Design Choice in the Sharing Economy: How Different Institutional Logics Drive Consumer Perception and Consumers’ Intention to Use Sharing Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 201-234, June.
    8. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka, 2021. "Market-shaping: navigating multiple theoretical perspectives," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 336-353, December.
    9. Lourenção, Marina & de Moura Engracia Giraldi, Janaina & de Oliveira, Jorge Henrique Caldeira, 2020. "Destination advertisement semiotic signs: Analysing tourists' visual attention and perceived ad effectiveness," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Laurianne Schmitt & Eric Casenave & Jessie Pallud, 2021. "Salespeople's work toward the institutionalization of social selling practices," Post-Print hal-03868903, HAL.
    11. Huff, Aimee Dinnin & Barnhart, Michelle, 2022. "UNRAVEL-ing gnarly knots: A path for researching market-entangled wicked social problems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 717-727.
    12. Breidbach, Christoph F. & Tana, Silviana, 2021. "Betting on Bitcoin: How social collectives shape cryptocurrency markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 311-320.
    13. Jafari, Aliakbar & Aly, Marwa & Doherty, Anne Marie, 2022. "An analytical review of market system dynamics in consumer culture theory research: Insights from the sociology of markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1261-1274.
    14. Christian H. Koch, 0. "Brands as activists: The Oatly case," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    15. Corciolani, Matteo, 2023. "Navigating institutional complexity through emotion work: The case of Italian consumers adapting to a ketogenic diet," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Lyngdoh, Teidorlang & Chefor, Ellis & Hochstein, Bryan & Britton, Benjamin P. & Amyx, Douglas, 2021. "A systematic literature review of negative psychological states and behaviors in sales," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 518-533.
    17. Steven Shepherd & Ted Matherly, 2021. "Racialization of peer‐to‐peer transactions: Inequality and barriers to legitimacy," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 417-444, June.
    18. Emmanuel Ogiemwonyi Arakpogun & Padmali Rodrigo & Femi Olan, 2022. "“You Shall Not Pass” without a Jab: An Institutional Theory Perspective to COVID-19 Vaccine Passport Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02534085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.