IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02313033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organizational justice : New insights from behavioural ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan R. Crawshaw

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Russell Cropanzano
  • Chris M. Bell
  • Thierry Nadisic

Abstract

Both organizational justice and behavioural ethics are concerned with questions of ‘right and wrong' in the context of work organizations. Until recently they have developed largely independently of each other, choosing to focus on subtly different concerns, constructs and research questions. The last few years have, however, witnessed a significant growth in theoretical and empirical research integrating these closely related academic specialities. We review the organizational justice literature, illustrating the impact of behavioural ethics research on important fairness questions. We argue that organizational justice research is focused on four reoccurring issues: (i) why justice at work matters to individuals; (ii) how justice judgements are formed; (iii) the consequences of injustice; and (iv) the factors antecedent to justice perceptions. Current and future justice research has begun and will continue borrowing from the behavioural ethics literature in answering these questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan R. Crawshaw & Russell Cropanzano & Chris M. Bell & Thierry Nadisic, 2013. "Organizational justice : New insights from behavioural ethics," Post-Print hal-02313033, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02313033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frans Gana & Mintje Ratoe Oedjoe & Pius Bumi Kellen & Togar Tua Amiruddin Pangaribuan, 2022. "The Effect of Transformational Leadership, Organizational Commitment, Work Life Balance, Motivation, Social Conditions on the Soldiers Performance of Main Naval Base Navy VII/Kupang, Indonesia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(8), pages 265-272, August.
    2. Smith, David. M. & Gillin, Nicola, 2021. "Filipino nurse migration to the UK: Understanding migration choices from an ontological security-seeking perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Claudia Toma & Annabelle Martin, 2024. "Diversity management approaches for organizational justice: Insights from Belgian hospitals," Working Papers CEB 24-005, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Gabriele Jacobs & Anne Keegan, 2018. "Ethical Considerations and Change Recipients’ Reactions: ‘It’s Not All About Me’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 73-90, September.
    5. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu, 2020. "The Mirage of Procedural Justice and the Primacy of Interactional Justice in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 495-512, December.
    6. Sultan Adal Mehmood & Devika Nadarajah & Muhammad Saood Akhtar, 2022. "How community embeddedness of public sector employees is formed by organisational justice and leads to counterproductive work behaviour," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 783-802, September.
    7. Marion Fortin & Thierry Nadisic & Chris M. Bell & Jonathan R. Crawshaw & Russell Cropanzano, 2016. "Beyond the Particular and Universal: Dependence, Independence, and Interdependence of Context, Justice, and Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 639-647, September.
    8. Christian Fieseler & Eliane Bucher & Christian Pieter Hoffmann, 2019. "Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 987-1005, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02313033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.