IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01306565.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mise en œuvre d’une recherche de type design science : retour sur l’expérimentation Knowledge Management Platorm

Author

Listed:
  • Amandine Pascal

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Cette communication a pour objectif de mettre en évidence, analyser et discuter notre vision et nos apports aux approches en design science dans deux domaines : l'organisation et les systèmes d'information. Notre intérêt pour ce type d'approche a émergé dans le cadre d'un projet collectif, le projet Knowledge Management Platform, né lors d'une rencontre avec des responsables de l'association Telecom Valley à Sophia Antipolis (France). Ces acteurs souffraient d'un manque de visibilité sur « qui fait quoi » ce qui constituait une entrave à leur capacité à nouer des partenariats locaux. L'objectif du projet KMP était donc de construire une solution innovante de « KnowledgeManagement » partagée entre les différents acteurs de TV, composante d'un portail web destiné à une communauté d'entreprises, d'institutionnels et d'organismes de recherche pour instrumenter de la manière la plus efficace possible, un processus d'échange et de combinaison de leurs connaissances et compétences Pour construire cette cartographie des compétences, nous avons élaboré une nouvelle méthodologie de design science qui pourra, dans un premier temps, être présentée. Cette méthodologie doit son originalité à deux éléments. Elle combine d'une part les aspects clés des deux démarches de design science identifiées dans la littérature en organisation : un recours aux théories existantes (démarche dite science-based) et la prise en compte des pratiques et des usages (démarche dite human-centered). Elle prône d'autre part l'intégration systématique des praticiens dans la démarche de design afin de mettre en place un processus de co-création de connaissances à la fois théoriques et pratiques indispensable dans le cas de conception innovante.

Suggested Citation

  • Amandine Pascal, 2015. "Mise en œuvre d’une recherche de type design science : retour sur l’expérimentation Knowledge Management Platorm," Post-Print hal-01306565, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01306565
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01306565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01306565/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Georges L. Romme & Gerard Endenburg, 2006. "Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 287-297, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Burg, E. & Gilsing, V.A. & Reymen, I.M.M.J. & Romme, A.G.L., 2008. "Creating university spin-offs : A science-based design perspective," Other publications TiSEM ed13609d-fde4-43dc-ba8a-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Raphaël Didier, 2022. "A community's resilience to the COVID-19 crisis - The Florain monetary community," Working Papers hal-03641952, HAL.
    3. Stefan Heusinkveld & Armand Smits, 2025. "Where do maverick organization design ideas come from? Approaches to studying the development of organizational design knowledge," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 14(1), pages 51-60, March.
    4. A. Georges L. Romme & John Bell & Guus Frericks, 2023. "Designing a deep-tech venture builder to address grand challenges and overcome the valley of death," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(4), pages 217-237, December.
    5. Paul C. Fenema & A. Georges L. Romme, 2020. "Latent organizing for responding to emergencies: foundations for research," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Ali Marjovi & Behrouz Zarei, 2023. "Design-oriented policy interventions: The case of technology-based international entrepreneurship in emerging context," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 111-142, March.
    7. A. Georges L. Romme & Christopher Ansell & John Buck & Younghoon Choi & Rob van der Eyden & Ver?nica Figueroa Huencho & Edwin John & Tracy Kunkler & Johanna Mair & Albert Meijer & Renate Meyer & Karen, 2018. "United People: Designing A New Model of Global Governance," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(4), pages 152-170, April.
    8. Stadtherr, Frank & Wouters, Marc, 2021. "Extending target costing to include targets for R&D costs and production investments for a modular product portfolio—A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Gerard P. Hodgkinson & Denise M. Rousseau, 2009. "Bridging the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research: It's Already Happening!," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 534-546, May.
    10. A. Georges L. Romme & Harry van de Loo & Ben Dankbaar, 2022. "How to Control Civil Servants: Designing and Testing a Solution Informed by Game Theory," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Thinley Tharchen & Raghu Garud & Rebecca L. Henn, 2020. "Design as an interactive boundary object," Post-Print hal-03188179, HAL.
    12. Friedrich A. Halstenberg & Kai Lindow & Rainer Stark, 2019. "Leveraging Circular Economy through a Methodology for Smart Service Systems Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-36, June.
    13. Leandro Gauss & Daniel P. Lacerda & A. Georges L. Romme, 2024. "Mechanisms as boundary objects for connecting design with science in operations management research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 291-306, March.
    14. Emil Velinov, 2017. "The Relationship between Contemporary Holacratic Models of Management and Company Performance: Evidence from Global Corporations in the World," GATR Journals gjbssr462, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    15. Thinley Tharchen & Raghu Garud & Rebecca L. Henn, 2020. "Design as an interactive boundary object," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    16. David Lamelas & José Lamelas & José Filipe, 2015. "Organizational Design Redefined by Design Thinking. Case studies in the hotel industry," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 5(4), pages 959-959.
    17. Yashar Mansoori & Martin Lackéus, 2020. "Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 791-818, March.
    18. A. Georges L. Romme, 2019. "Climbing up and down the hierarchy of accountability: implications for organization design," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Anselm Schneider & Andreas Scherer, 2015. "Corporate Governance in a Risk Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 309-323, January.
    20. Stephen X. Zhang & Elco Burg, 2020. "Advancing entrepreneurship as a design science: developing additional design principles for effectuation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 607-626, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01306565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.