IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00481383.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Numerical representations of imperfectly ordered preferences (a unified geometric exposition)

Author

Listed:
  • Itzhak Gilboa

    (Northwestern University [Evanston])

  • Avraham Beja

    (TAU - Tel Aviv University)

Abstract

This paper uses "generalized numerical representations" to extend some of the result of utility theory regarding imperfectly ordered preferences in general and semiordered preferences in particular. It offers a unified geometric approach, which helps visualize how the increasingly stringent conditions of suborders, interval orders, semiorders, and weak orders give rise to increasingly intuitive representations. The differences between the proposed framework and the more traditional utility representations are especially significant in the context of uncountable sets

Suggested Citation

  • Itzhak Gilboa & Avraham Beja, 1992. "Numerical representations of imperfectly ordered preferences (a unified geometric exposition)," Post-Print hal-00481383, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00481383
    DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(92)90030-B
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Argenziano, Rossella & Gilboa, Itzhak, 2017. "Psychophysical foundations of the Cobb–Douglas utility function," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 21-23.
    2. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "Unit representation of semiorders II: The general case," Working Papers hal-02918017, HAL.
    3. Gilboa, Itzhak & Lapson, Robert, 1995. "Aggregation of Semiorders: Intransitive Indifference Makes a Difference," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(1), pages 109-126, January.
    4. Abrísqueta, Francisco J. & Candeal, Juan C. & Induráin, Esteban & Zudaire, Margarita, 2009. "Scott-Suppes representability of semiorders: Internal conditions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 245-261, March.
    5. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2004. "Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, Dominance, and Numerical Representations," Post-Print hal-00004104, HAL.
    6. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2021. "Unit representation of semiorders I: Countable sets," Post-Print hal-02918005, HAL.
    7. Nuh Aygün Dalkıran & Furkan Yıldız, 2021. "Another Characterization of Expected Scott-Suppes Utility Representation," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 177-193.
    8. Alejandro Islas-Camargo & Willy W. Cortez, 2004. "Convergencia salarial entre las principales ciudades mexicanas: Un analisis de cointegracion," EconoQuantum, Revista de Economia y Finanzas, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Economico Administrativas, Departamento de Metodos Cuantitativos y Maestria en Economia., vol. 1(0), pages 25-47, Enero - J.
    9. Pawel Dziewulski, 2016. "Eliciting the just-noticeable difference," Economics Series Working Papers 798, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    10. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "Unit representation of semiorders I: Countable sets," Working Papers hal-02918005, HAL.
    11. Dziewulski, Paweł, 2020. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency index," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Xiaosheng Mu, 2019. "Amendment Voting with Incomplete Preferences," Working Papers 2019-29, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    13. Leobardo Plata-Perez, 2004. "A numerical representation of acyclic preferences when non-comparability and indifference are concepts with different meaning," EconoQuantum, Revista de Economia y Finanzas, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Economico Administrativas, Departamento de Metodos Cuantitativos y Maestria en Economia., vol. 1(0), pages 17-23, Enero - J.
    14. Pawel Dziewulski, 2021. "A comprehensive revealed preference approach to approximate utility maximisation," Working Paper Series 0621, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Pawel Dziewulski, 2018. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency," Economics Series Working Papers 848, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    16. Xiaosheng Mu, 2021. "Sequential Choice with Incomplete Preferences," Working Papers 2021-35, Princeton University. Economics Department..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00481383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.