IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00168958.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Classical Risk Models

Author

Listed:
  • Claude Lefèvre

    (ULB - Département de Mathématique [Bruxelles] - ULB - Faculté des Sciences [Bruxelles] - ULB - Université libre de Bruxelles)

  • Stéphane Loisel

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the problem of ruin in the classical compound binomial and compound Poisson risk models. Our primary purpose is to extend to those models an exact formula derived by Picard and Lefèvre (1997) for the probability of (non-)ruin within finite time. First, a standard method based on the ballot theorem and an argument of Seal-type provides an initial (known) formula for that probability. Then, a concept of pseudo-distributions for the cumulated claim amounts, combined with some simple implications of the ballot theorem, leads to the desired formula. Two expressions for the (non-)ruin probability over an infinite horizon are also deduced as corollaries. Finally, an illustration within the framework of Solvency II is briefly presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2008. "On Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Classical Risk Models," Post-Print hal-00168958, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00168958
    DOI: 10.1080/03461230701766882
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00168958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00168958/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461230701766882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rulliere, Didier & Loisel, Stephane, 2004. "Another look at the Picard-Lefevre formula for finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 187-203, October.
    2. Loisel, Stéphane & Mazza, Christian & Rullière, Didier, 2008. "Robustness analysis and convergence of empirical finite-time ruin probabilities and estimation risk solvency margin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 746-762, April.
    3. Cheng, Shixue & Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S. W., 2000. "Discounted probabilities and ruin theory in the compound binomial model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2-3), pages 239-250, May.
    4. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 1998. "On the Time Value of Ruin," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 48-72.
    5. De Vylder, F. Etienne & Goovaerts, Marc J., 1999. "Explicit finite-time and infinite-time ruin probabilities in the continuous case," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 155-172, May.
    6. Shiu, Elias S.W., 1989. "The Probability of Eventual Ruin in the Compound Binomial Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 179-190, November.
    7. Konstantopoulos, Takis, 1995. "Ballot theorems revisited," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 331-338, September.
    8. Willmot, Gordon E., 1993. "Ruin probabilities in the compound binomial model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, April.
    9. Gerber, Hans U., 1988. "Mathematical Fun with the Compound Binomial Process," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 161-168, November.
    10. Li, Shuanming & Garrido, José, 2002. "On the time value of ruin in the discrete time risk model," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb021812, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    11. Dickson, D.C.M., 1999. "On Numerical Evaluation of Finite Time Survival Probabilities," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 575-584, August.
    12. Ignatov, Zvetan G. & Kaishev, Vladimir K. & Krachunov, Rossen S., 2001. "An improved finite-time ruin probability formula and its Mathematica implementation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 375-386, December.
    13. De Vylder, F. & Goovaerts, M. J., 1988. "Recursive calculation of finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, January.
    14. Cardoso, Rui M. R. & R. Waters, Howard, 2003. "Recursive calculation of finite time ruin probabilities under interest force," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 659-676, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00746251 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Dutang, C. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2013. "On an asymptotic rule A+B/u for ultimate ruin probabilities under dependence by mixing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 774-785.
    3. Irmina Czarna & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2009. "De Finetti's dividend problem and impulse control for a two-dimensional insurance risk process," Papers 0906.2100, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2011.
    4. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 425-441, September.
    5. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2022. "Dynamic conditional mean risk sharing in the compound Poisson surplus model," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022034, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. Kam Pui Wat & Kam Chuen Yuen & Wai Keung Li & Xueyuan Wu, 2018. "On the Compound Binomial Risk Model with Delayed Claims and Randomized Dividends," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Loisel, Stéphane & Mazza, Christian & Rullière, Didier, 2009. "Convergence and asymptotic variance of bootstrapped finite-time ruin probabilities with partly shifted risk processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 374-381, December.
    8. Lanpeng Ji & Chunsheng Zhang, 2014. "A Duality Result for the Generalized Erlang Risk Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-11, November.
    9. Romain Biard & Stéphane Loisel & Claudio Macci & Noel Veraverbeke, 2010. "Asymptotic behavior of the finite-time expected time-integrated negative part of some risk processes and optimal reserve allocation," Post-Print hal-00372525, HAL.
    10. Yi Lu, 2016. "On the Evaluation of Expected Penalties at Claim Instants That Cause Ruin in the Classical Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 237-255, March.
    11. Lee, Wing Yan & Li, Xiaolong & Liu, Fangda & Shi, Yifan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2021. "A Fourier-cosine method for finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 256-267.
    12. Gathy, Maude & Lefèvre, Claude, 2010. "On the Lagrangian Katz family of distributions as a claim frequency model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 76-83, August.
    13. Julien Trufin & Stéphane Loisel, 2013. "Ultimate ruin probability in discrete time with Bühlmann credibility premium adjustments," Post-Print hal-00426790, HAL.
    14. Stéphane Loisel & Claude Lefèvre, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Post-Print hal-00201377, HAL.
    15. Muhsin Tamturk & Sergey Utev, 2019. "Optimal Reinsurance via Dirac-Feynman Approach," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 647-659, June.
    16. Hamed Amini & Zhongyuan Cao & Andreea Minca & Agn`es Sulem, 2023. "Ruin Probabilities for Risk Processes in Stochastic Networks," Papers 2302.06668, arXiv.org.
    17. Yuen, Fei Lung & Lee, Wing Yan & Fung, Derrick W.H., 2020. "A cyclic approach on classical ruin model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 104-110.
    18. Edita Kizinevič & Jonas Šiaulys, 2018. "The Exponential Estimate of the Ultimate Ruin Probability for the Non-Homogeneous Renewal Risk Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Serkan Eryilmaz, 2014. "On Distributions of Runs in the Compound Binomial Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 149-159, March.
    20. Andrius Grigutis & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Ultimate Time Survival Probability in Three-Risk Discrete Time Risk Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, January.
    21. Li Qin & Susan M. Pitts, 2012. "Nonparametric Estimation of the Finite-Time Survival Probability with Zero Initial Capital in the Classical Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 919-936, December.
    22. Li, Shuanming & Lu, Yi, 2017. "Distributional study of finite-time ruin related problems for the classical risk model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 319-330.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavlova, Kristina P. & Willmot, Gordon E., 2004. "The discrete stationary renewal risk model and the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 267-277, October.
    2. Jae-Kyung Woo & Haibo Liu, 2018. "Discounted Aggregate Claim Costs Until Ruin in the Discrete-Time Renewal Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1285-1318, December.
    3. Li Qin & Susan M. Pitts, 2012. "Nonparametric Estimation of the Finite-Time Survival Probability with Zero Initial Capital in the Classical Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 919-936, December.
    4. Kam Pui Wat & Kam Chuen Yuen & Wai Keung Li & Xueyuan Wu, 2018. "On the Compound Binomial Risk Model with Delayed Claims and Randomized Dividends," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Marceau, Etienne, 2009. "On the discrete-time compound renewal risk model with dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 245-259, April.
    6. Yang, Hu & Zhang, Zhimin & Lan, Chunmei, 2009. "Ruin problems in a discrete Markov risk model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 21-28, January.
    7. Dutang, C. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2013. "On an asymptotic rule A+B/u for ultimate ruin probabilities under dependence by mixing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 774-785.
    8. Li, Shuanming & Garrido, José, 2002. "On the time value of ruin in the discrete time risk model," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb021812, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    9. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 425-441, September.
    10. Bao, Zhenhua & Song, Lixin & Liu, He, 2013. "A note on the inflated-parameter binomial distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(8), pages 1911-1914.
    11. Liu, Guoxin & Zhao, Jinyan, 2007. "Joint distributions of some actuarial random vectors in the compound binomial model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 95-103, January.
    12. Andrius Grigutis & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Ultimate Time Survival Probability in Three-Risk Discrete Time Risk Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Chen, Mi & Yuen, Kam Chuen & Guo, Junyi, 2014. "Survival probabilities in a discrete semi-Markov risk model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 205-215.
    14. David Landriault, 2008. "On a generalization of the expected discounted penalty function in a discrete‐time insurance risk model," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 525-539, November.
    15. Stéphane Loisel & Claude Lefèvre, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Post-Print hal-00201377, HAL.
    16. Liu, Guoxin & Wang, Ying & Zhang, Bei, 2005. "Ruin probability in the continuous-time compound binomial model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 303-316, June.
    17. S. X. Liu & J. Y. Guo, 2006. "Discrete Risk Model Revisited," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 303-313, June.
    18. Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne & Trufin, Julien & Zuyderhoff, Pierre, 2020. "Ruin-based risk measures in discrete-time risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 246-261.
    19. Tan, Jiyang & Yang, Xiangqun, 2006. "The compound binomial model with randomized decisions on paying dividends," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Li, Shuanming & Lu, Yi, 2017. "Distributional study of finite-time ruin related problems for the classical risk model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 319-330.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00168958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.