IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gwi/wpaper/2010-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Post-Montesquieu Analysis of the WTO

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Charnovitz

    () (GW Law, George Washington University)

Abstract

In writing The Spirit of Laws in 1748, baron de la Brde et de Montesquieu does not foresee the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) (Montesquieu 1748). Nevertheless, one can employ Montesquieus methodology to analyse the functions and dysfunctions of the WTO because his cogent framework, although written for the national level, is translatable to the international level of government. Although Montesquieu has been discussed tangentially in WTO scholarship, this chapter places him at the centreof an analysis of how the WTO can be improved.This chapter is titled post-Montesquieu because it will update Montesquieus framework in a few important respects. Montesquieu did not anticipate the ubiquity of democracy (much of his book discusses monarchies), the political importance of public participation, and the rise of international organisations. More telling, though, is how little of The Spirit of Laws needs to be updated, because of the presence of Montesquieus spirit in modern political institutions an economic development. Although many scholars anthropomorphise the WTO, I have come to the view that it (like any international organisation) ought to be viewed primarily as a community. The actors in the WTO community are the Members represented by ambassadors, the Director-General (DG), the Secretariat, the private enterprises that trade, and civil society. Of course, the WTO still lags behind other major international organisations in providing for ongoing participation by civil society (see Ripinksy and van den Bossche 2007: Chapters 1112).This chapter proceeds in three sections: Section I summarises the ideas from The Spirit of Laws that are most relevant to the WTO, and explains where Montesquieus analysis needs adaptation. The second section uses Montesquieu to benchmark the WTO and point out areas for improvement. The last part of this section uses the post-Montesquieu framework to discuss the relationship between the WTO, business enterprises, civic society, and Member governments. The third section provides a conclusion, kept brief due to space limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Charnovitz, "undated". "A Post-Montesquieu Analysis of the WTO," Working Papers 2010-3, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2010-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.gwu.edu/~iiep/assets/docs/papers/Charnovitz_IIEPWP2010-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel C. Esty, 2007. "Good Governance at the World Trade Organization: Building a Foundation of Administrative Law," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 509-527, September.
    2. Thomas Cottier, 2007. "Preparing for Structural Reform in the WTO," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 497-508, September.
    3. Jones, Kent, 2009. "The political economy of WTO accession: the unfinished business of universal membership," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(02), pages 279-314, April.
    4. Steve Charnovitz, 1995. "Strengthening the international employment regime," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;German National Library of Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 30(5), pages 221-233, September.
    5. Tijmes-Lhl, Jaime, 2009. "Consensus and majority voting in the WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(03), pages 417-437, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gwi:wpaper:2010-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kyle Renner). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iigwuus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.