IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gro/rugsom/98a07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Production planning systems for cellular manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Riezebos, J.

    (Groningen University)

Abstract

New product development is one of the most powerful but difficult activities in business. It is also a very important factor affecting final product quality. There are many techniques available for new product development. Experimental design is now regarded as one of the most significant techniques. In this article, we will discuss how to use the technique of experimental design in developing a new product - an extrusion press. In order to provide a better understanding of this specific process, a brief description of the extrusion press is presented. To ensure the successful development of the extrusion press, customer requirements and expectations were obtained by detailed market research. The critical and non-critical factors affecting the performance of the extrusion press were identified in preliminary experiments. Through conducting single factorial experiments, the critical factorial levels were determined. The relationships between the performance indexes of the extrusion press and the four critical factors were determined on the basis of multi-factorial experiments. The mathematical models for the performance of the extrusion press were established according to a central composite rotatable design. The best combination of the four critical factors and the optimum performance indexes were determined by optimum design. The results were verified by conducting a confirmatory experiment. Finally, a number of conclusions became evident.

Suggested Citation

  • Riezebos, J., 1998. "Production planning systems for cellular manufacturing," Research Report 98A07, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
  • Handle: RePEc:gro:rugsom:98a07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/167181491
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dale, BG & Russell, D, 1983. "Production control systems for small group production," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 175-185.
    2. Mosier, Charles & Taube, Larry, 1985. "The facets of group technology and their impacts on implementation--A state-of-the-art survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 381-391.
    3. Lee J. Krajewski & Barry E. King & Larry P. Ritzman & Danny S. Wong, 1987. "Kanban, MRP, and Shaping the Manufacturing Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 39-57, January.
    4. Rohloff, M., 1993. "Decentralized production planning and design of a production management system based on an object-oriented architecture," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 365-383, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Solimanpur, M. & Vrat, Prem & Shankar, Ravi, 2004. "A heuristic to minimize makespan of cell scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 231-241, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dgr:rugsom:98a07 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Safaei, Nima & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2009. "Integrated multi-period cell formation and subcontracting production planning in dynamic cellular manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 301-314, August.
    3. Jonsson, Patrik, 2008. "Exploring problems related to the materials planning user environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 383-400, May.
    4. Sanchez, Susan M. & Moeeni, Farhad & Sanchez, Paul J., 2006. "So many factors, so little time...Simulation experiments in the frequency domain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 149-165, September.
    5. Riezebos, J. & Gaalman, G.J.C., 1995. "Relations between cells in cellular manufacturing," Research Report 95A45, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    6. Vikrant Sharma & Sundeep Kumar & M. L. Meena, 2022. "Key criteria influencing cellular manufacturing system: a fuzzy AHP model," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 65-84, January.
    7. White, Richard E. & Prybutok, Victor, 2001. "The relationship between JIT practices and type of production system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 113-124, April.
    8. Molleman, Eric & Slomp, Jannes & Rolefes, Samantha, 2002. "The evolution of a cellular manufacturing system - a longitudinal case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 305-322, February.
    9. Gaury, E.G.A. & Pierreval, H. & Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1998. "New species of hybrid pull systems," Discussion Paper 1998-31, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Fleisch, Elgar & Tellkamp, Christian, 2005. "Inventory inaccuracy and supply chain performance: a simulation study of a retail supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 373-385, March.
    11. Yucesan, Enver & de Groote, Xavier, 2000. "Lead times, order release mechanisms, and customer service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 118-130, January.
    12. Jacobs, F. Robert & Bendoly, Elliot, 2003. "Enterprise resource planning: Developments and directions for operations management research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 233-240, April.
    13. Hirakawa, Yasuhiro, 1996. "Performance of a multistage hybrid push/pull production control system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 129-135, June.
    14. repec:dgr:rugsom:02a42 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Ishii, Kazuyoshi & Imori, Shigeki, 1996. "A production ordering system for two-item, two-stage, capacity-constraint production and inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 119-128, June.
    16. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    17. repec:dgr:rugsom:95a45 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Oke, Adegoke & Szwejczewski, Marek, 2005. "The relationship between UK manufacturers' inventory levels and supply, internal and market factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 151-160, January.
    19. Hurley, Simon F. & Clay Whybark, D., 1999. "Inventory and capacity trade-offs in a manufacturing cell," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 203-212, March.
    20. Riezebos, Jan, 2002. "Time bucket size and lot-splitting approach," Research Report 02A42, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    21. Libralesso, Luc & Focke, Pablo Andres & Secardin, Aurélien & Jost, Vincent, 2022. "Iterative beam search algorithms for the permutation flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 217-234.
    22. Stawowy, Adam, 2006. "Evolutionary strategy for manufacturing cell design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-18, January.
    23. Logendran, Rasaratnam & Talkington, Diane, 1997. "Analysis of cellular and functional manufacturing systems in the presence of machine breakdown," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 239-256, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gro:rugsom:98a07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hanneke Tamling (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.