IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprwp/183097.html

Farm commercialization and farm services: Myanmar Agricultural Performance Survey (monsoon 2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Ei Win, Hnin
  • Minten, Bart

Abstract

This Working Paper presents findings from an assessment of farm commercialization and farm services during the 2025 monsoon. The analysis is based on data from the Myanmar Agriculture Performance Survey (MAPS), a phone-based survey conducted with 4,553 crop farmers across all states/regions of the country during Q1 of 2026. Our findings reveal the following: Insecurity continues to affect farming, as reflected in the substantial share of farmers who feel unsafe and report being unable to move freely to buy inputs or sell outputs without serious concerns for their safety. Twenty-three percent of farmers reported feeling “very insecure” or “insecure” during the survey period. Additionally, 7 percent reported that some agricultural fields in their area could not be cultivated due to conflict. Furthermore, 9 percent of farmers expressed fear of storing produce at home because of the risk of confiscation or destruction. Despite challenges related to fuel and mobility, agricultural inputs were largely available during the monsoon, reflecting the resilience of the private sector in supplying these goods even under difficult conditions. However, labor scarcity is becoming more pronounced, seemingly linked to migration and insecurity. Input prices continued to rise, with fertilizer prices increasing by 24 percent compared to two years earlier. Other input costs, including mechanization and wages, increased even more. On the output side, prices for paddy—grown by 64 percent of all farmers during the monsoon—fell over the last two years, leading to reduced investments and lower agricultural productivity. Other crops linked to export markets also experienced price declines or only moderate increases over the same period, including pigeon pea (-18 percent) and maize (+28 percent), compared to much larger increases for more domestically consumed crops such as tomato (+178 percent), betel nut (+75 percent), and betel leaves (+43 percent). Most farmers reported either stabilization or worsening of agricultural sales income compared to the previous monsoon. Thirty-nine percent of farmers reported lower incomes in the 2025 monsoon season than in the previous monsoon, with 22 percent experiencing declines of more than 20 percent. Only 30 percent reported an increase in sales income. The use of agricultural credit during the 2025 monsoon continued its decline, falling from 47 percent of farmers in 2021 to 38 percent in 2025—a decrease of 9 percentage points. This decline occurred across all agro-ecological zones except the Delta. Access to agricultural extension services remained at levels similar to previous years, with 35 percent of farmers accessing some type of extension service. Security challenges continue to hinder crop commercialization in Myanmar. Conditions vary across states and regions, with the Delta—the country’s rice bowl—experiencing relatively better security conditions. Farmers in conflict-affected areas face greater obstacles to commercialization, including reduced availability of agricultural inputs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ei Win, Hnin & Minten, Bart, 2026. "Farm commercialization and farm services: Myanmar Agricultural Performance Survey (monsoon 2025)," IFPRI working papers 79, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprwp:183097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/183097
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minten, Bart & Goeb, Joseph & Zin Win, Khin & Pye Zone, Phoo, 2023. "Agricultural value chains in a fragile state: The case of rice in Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Li & Chenying Liu & Qizhi Yang & Yulan You & Zhihang Zhuo & Xiaolin Zuo, 2023. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Vertical Collaboration in the Agri-Chain Guided by Leading Enterprises: A Study of the Table Grape Industry in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, September.
    2. repec:ags:cfcp15:344306 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Goeb, Joseph & Minten, Bart & Reardon, Thomas & Zu, A Myint & Htar, May Thet, 2026. "Vertical integration and the modernization of staple food value chains: Evidence from Myanmar’s rice sector," IFPRI working papers 77, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Masias, Ian & Minten, Bart & van Asselt, Joanna & Naing, Phyo Thandar & Ei Win, Hnin, 2026. "Crop diversification and nutritional resilience amid conflicts: Evidence from farmers in Myanmar," IFPRI discussion papers 2406, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Ferry Syarifuddin, 2024. "Islamic Macroprudential Policy to Support Staple Agricultural Sector Financing," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(3), pages 15-45.
    6. Ayalew, Hailemariam & Berhane, Guush & Wondale, Meseret & Breisinger, Clemens, 2024. "Farming under fire: The interplay of armed conflict and climate-induced weather disruptions in agricultural input use," IFPRI discussion papers 2307, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Minten, Bart & van Asselt, Joanna & Lambrecht, Isabel Brigitte & Masias, Ian & Goeb, Joseph & Wai Aung, Zin & Thet Htar, May, 2025. "Fertilizer and conflicts: Evidence from Myanmar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Goeb, Joseph & San, Cho Cho & Belton, Ben & Synt, Nang Lun Kham & Aung, Nilar & Maredia, Mywish & Minten, Bart, 2025. "Traders and agri-food value chain resilience: the case of maize in Myanmar," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprwp:183097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.