IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedhpr/466.html

A general method of deriving the inefficiencies of banks from a profit function

Author

Listed:
  • Jalal D. Akhavein
  • P. A. V. B. Swamy
  • Stephen B. Taubman

Abstract

Questions of whether the evolution of the financial services industry results in more efficient intermediaries, better prices and service quality for consumers, and greater bank safety and soundness cannot be answered without addressing the cost and revenue efficiencies of the industry. Most studies of the efficiency of financial institutions have used an econometric approach to measure efficiency. This paper tries to address potential econometric problems of previous efficiency studies and suggests a new technique for measuring efficiency. This method is applied to data on U.S. commercial banks from 1984 through 1989. Previous studies used one of four different approaches for estimating X-efficiencies - the econometric frontier approach, the thick frontier approach, data envelopment analysis, and the distribution free approaches. In all four cases, the econometric problem of estimating X-efficiencies is defined simply as one of distinguishing between two components of a random error term added to a cost or profit function. The authors suggest that it is possible that the actual econometric problem of estimating X-inefficiencies is not as simple as the problem of distinguishing between two random components because of the following three reasons: ( i ) the true functional forms of the cost or profit functions of the firms are usually unknown; ( ii ) explanatory variables excluded from the cost or profit function are likely to be correlated with the explanatory variables included in the function; and (iii) inconsistencies may arise if arbitrary error terms are added to a cost or profit function and their corresponding share equations. The authors use a fixed-coefficients model that allows them to address the econometric problems mentioned above. This methodology also allows for the estimation of a separate frontier for each firm as opposed to previous studies that estimate one frontier which is common to all firms. The results of the paper show that the residual whic
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Jalal D. Akhavein & P. A. V. B. Swamy & Stephen B. Taubman, 1995. "A general method of deriving the inefficiencies of banks from a profit function," Proceedings 466, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedhpr:466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/bank-structure-conference-9866/new-tool-set-assessing-innovations-banking-724431?page=396
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lummer, Scott L. & McConnell, John J., 1989. "Further evidence on the bank lending process and the capital-market response to bank loan agreements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 99-122, November.
    2. Flannery, Mark J, 1986. "Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 41(1), pages 19-37, March.
    3. Puri, Manju, 1994. "The long-term default performance of bank underwritten security issues," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 397-418, January.
    4. Ang, James S. & Richardson, Terry, 1994. "The underwriting experience of commercial bank affiliates prior to the Glass-Steagall Act: A reexamination of evidence for passage of the act," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 351-395, January.
    5. Fama, Eugene F., 1985. "What's different about banks?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 29-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dias, Weeratilake, 1998. "Productivity And Efficiency Of Agricultural And Non Agricultural Banks In The United States: Dea Approach," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20845, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Robert DeYoung & Kenneth Spong & Richard J. Sullivan, 1999. "Who's minding the store? motivating and monitoring hired managers at small, closely held firms: the case of commercial banks," Working Paper Series WP-99-17, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    3. José Luis Carreño G. & Gino Loyola F. & Yolanda Portilla S., 2010. "Banking Efficiency in Chile: a Profit Frontier Approach," Journal Econom a Chilena (The Chilean Economy), Central Bank of Chile, vol. 13(3), pages 33-65, December.
    4. Chung-Hua Shen, 2005. "Cost efficiency and banking performances in a partial universal banking system: application of the panel smooth threshold model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 993-1009.
    5. Park, Byeong U. & Sickles, Robin C. & Simar, Leopold, 2003. "Corrigendum to "Semiparametric-efficient estimation of AR(1) panel data models": [J. Econom. 117 (2003) 279-309]," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 311-311, December.
    6. Berger, Allen N. & Mester, Loretta J., 1997. "Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 895-947, July.
    7. Jalal D. Akhavein & Allen N. Berger & David B. Humphrey, "undated". "The Effects of Megamergers on Efficiency and Prices: Evidence from a Bank Profit Function," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1997-09, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), revised 10 Dec 2019.
    8. Mester, Loretta J., 1997. "Measuring efficiency at U.S. banks: Accounting for heterogeneity is important," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 230-242, April.
    9. Toivanen, Otto, 1997. "Economies of scale and scope in the Finnish non-life insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 759-779, June.
    10. Vivas, Ana Lozano, 1997. "Profit efficiency for Spanish savings banks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 381-394, April.
    11. Tai-Hsin Huang, 2000. "Estimating X-Efficiency in Taiwanese Banking Using a Translog Shadow Profit Function," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 225-245, November.
    12. Margono, Heru & Sharma, Subhash C. & Melvin II, Paul D., 2010. "Cost efficiency, economies of scale, technological progress and productivity in Indonesian banks," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 53-65, February.
    13. Donald J. Mullineaux & Mark K. Pyles, 2010. "Bank marketing investments and bank performance," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(4), pages 326-345, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank V. Cahouet, 1995. "The strategy behind the Mellon/Dreyfus merger," Proceedings 443, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    2. Richard S. Carnell, 1995. "Innovation and banking risk," Proceedings 438, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    3. Joe Peek & Eric Rosengren, 1995. "The effects of interstate branching on small business lending," Proceedings 462, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    4. Benjamin C. Esty, 1995. "South Shore Bank: is it the model of success for community development banks?," Proceedings 455, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    5. Gary D. Koppenhaver, 1995. "Assessing derivative market positions," Proceedings 474, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    6. James A. Berkovec & Glenn B. Canner & Stuart A. Gabriel & Timothy H. Hannan, 1995. "Mortgage discrimination and FHA loan performance," Proceedings 456, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    7. Ruth de Krivoy, 1995. "Lessons from financial crises: evidence from Venezuela," Proceedings 453, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    8. Vincent P. Apilado & John G. Gallo & James Kolari, 1995. "Commercial bank mutual fund activities: implications for bank risk and profitability," Proceedings 480, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    9. Thomas F. Cargill & Michael M. Hutchison & Takatoshi Ito, 1995. "Lessons from financial crisis: the Japanese case," Proceedings 450, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    10. Suzanne M. Holifield & Michael B. Madaris & William H. Sackley, 1995. "Regulatory risk and hedge accounting standards in financial institutions: the case of Franklin Savings Association," Proceedings 458, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    11. John F. Marshall, 1995. "Derivatives and risk management," Proceedings 446, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    12. Mark J. Flannery & Sorin M. Sorescu, 1995. "Pricing bank default risk in subordinated debenture yields," Proceedings 470, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    13. Stewart Myers & Raghuram G. Rajan, 1995. "Liquidity and the rise of financial intermediation," Proceedings 468, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    14. Fred R. Kaen & Dag Michalsen, 1995. "The effects of the Norwegian banking crisis on Norwegian bank and nonbank stocks," Proceedings 452, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    15. Frank L. Gentry, 1995. "Assessing innovations in banking," Proceedings 439, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    16. Warren G. Heller, 1995. "Derivatives: are we better off as a result of the growth in this industry?," Proceedings 437, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    17. Matthew T. Billett & Jane F. Coburn & John P. O'Keefe, 1995. "Acquirer gains in FDIC-assisted bank mergers: the influence of bidder competition and FDIC resolution policies," Proceedings 460, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    18. Anne Beatty, 1995. "The effects of fair value accounting on investment portfolio management," Proceedings 459, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    19. Edward J. Kane, 1995. "What are large U.S. banks doing in taxable money market mutual funds?," Proceedings 441, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    20. Mark S. Carey, 1995. "Toxic waste, accounting, and regulation," Proceedings 457, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedhpr:466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lauren Wiese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.