IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Determinants of Retirement: Does Money Really matter?

  • Janice Compton
Registered author(s):

    The worker to non-worker ratio in Canada is forecasted to fall dramatically over the next few decades due both to demographic pressures and the recent decline in the average age of retirement. If governments desire to reverse these trends, it is necessary to determine whether altering Canada’s retirement income programs may impact retirement decisions. This analysis focuses on the CPP/QPP program using the internal longitudinal files of the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID) and concludes that limited changes to CPP/QPP benefit levels will not have a large impact on the labour force behaviour of older workers. CPP/QPP benefits can affect retirement through two channels – by altering the relative benefits of work (the substitution effect) and by changing the net present value of lifetime wealth (the wealth effect). We first demonstrate that retirement and CPP/QPP benefit take-up are not temporally connected for most Canadians. This means that the substitution effect is unlikely to have an important impact on retirement decisions. We then use hazard regressions and ordered probit analyses to determine which factors influence retirement behaviour. We find no evidence that expected CPP/QPP benefits or current wage levels influence the retirement decision. This result provides further evidence that CPP/QPP benefits are not having a large impact on retirement through the substitution effect. We also find no evidence that wealth affects the retirement decision. Instead, demographic factors such as disability status, labour force status of spouse and class of worker dominate the regressions. This does not necessarily mean that the CPP/QPP program does not influence retirement, only that its influence is likely to be embedded in the structure of the program and the existence of borrowing constraints rather than through the benefit levels. However, the results also indicate that structural changes may not be required in order to raise the retirement age. Variables that do have a strong effect on retirement behaviour are moving in directions that may result in a reversal of the early retirement trend. Au Canada, le ratio des actifs aux non-actifs devrait diminuer sensiblement au cours des prochaines décennies, en raison de tensions démographiques et de la récente baisse de l’âge moyen de la retraite. Si les administrations publiques désirent inverser ces tendances, il leur faut déterminer si la modification des régimes de revenu de retraite peut influer sur les décisions liées à la retraite. Cette analyse porte sur le RPC/RRQ; elle utilise les fichiers longitudinaux internes de l’enquête sur la dynamique du travail et du revenu (EDTR) et elle conclut que des changements limités aux prestations du RPC/RRQ n’auront pas d’importantes répercussions sur le comportement des travailleurs plus âgés. Les prestations du RPC/RRQ peuvent influer sur la retraite de deux façons – en modifiant les avantages comparatifs du travail (l’effet de substitution) et en changeant la valeur actualisée nette de la richesse viagère (l’effet de richesse). Nous démontrons d’abord que la retraite et les prestations du RPC/RRQ ne sont pas reliées dans le temps pour la plupart des Canadiens. Cela signifie que l’effet de substitution n’aura probablement pas de répercussions importantes sur les décisions liées à la retraite. Nous utilisons ensuite des régressions de risques et des analyses ordonnées par la méthode des probits pour déterminer les facteurs qui influent sur le comportement. Nous constatons que rien ne prouve que les prestations prévues du RPC/RRQ ou les salaires actuels influent sur les décisions liées à la retraite. Ce résultat prouve encore une fois que les prestations du RPC/RRQ n’ont pas de répercussions importantes sur la retraite par le biais de l’effet de substitution. Nous constatons aussi que rien ne prouve que la richesse influe sur les décisions liées à la retraite. Plutôt, des facteurs démographiques, comme l’état de personne handicapée, la situation d’activité du conjoint et la catégorie de travailleurs, dominent les régressions. Cela ne signifie pas nécessairement que le RPC/RRQ n’influe pas sur la retraite, mais seulement que son influence est probablement incluse dans la structure du programme et l’existence des contraintes d’emprunt plutôt que de se manifester par le biais des prestations. Toutefois, les résultats indiquent aussi qu’il se peut qu’il ne soit pas nécessaire d’apporter des changements structurels pour relever l’âge de la retraite. Les variables qui influent fortement sur le comportement évoluent dans des directions qui peuvent se traduire par une inversion de la tendance à la retraite anticipée.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Gustavo Durango)

    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Department of Finance Canada in its series Working Papers-Department of Finance Canada with number 2001-02.

    in new window

    Date of creation:
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:fca:wpfnca:2001-02
    Contact details of provider: Postal: 140 O'Connor St., Ottawa, K1A 0G5
    Phone: 613-992-1573
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fca:wpfnca:2001-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gustavo Durango)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Gustavo Durango to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.