Causes of mode effects: separating out interviewer and stimulus effects in comparisons of face-to-face and telephone surveys
We attempt to isolate the causes of mode effects on measurement in a comparison of face-to-face and telephone interviewing, distinguishing between effects caused by differences in the type of question stimulus used in each mode (audio vs. visual) and effects caused by other differences between the modes, notably, the presence or absence of the interviewer. We use data from an experiment conducted in the context of the European Social Survey. Differences in the stimulus did not lead to differential measurement error, but the presence or absence of the interviewer did. Telephone respondents were far more likely to give socially desirable responses than face-to-face respondents.
|Date of creation:||23 Nov 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: Publications Office, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ UK|
Web: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/publications/ Email:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Anders Wikman & Bo Wärneryd, 1990. "Measurement errors in survey questions: Explaining response variability," Social Indicators Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 199-212, March.
- repec:ese:iserwp:2006-41 is not listed on IDEAS
- repec:ese:iserwp:2008-08 is not listed on IDEAS
- Annette J‰ckle & Caroline Roberts & Peter Lynn, 2010.
"Assessing the Effect of Data Collection Mode on Measurement,"
International Statistical Review,
International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 3-20, 04.
- Andy Peytchev & Lisa R. Carley-Baxter & Michele C. Black, 2011. "Multiple Sources of Nonobservation Error in Telephone Surveys: Coverage and Nonresponse," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(1), pages 138-168, February.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2012-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paul Groves)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Paul Groves to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.