Causes of mode effects: separating out interviewer and stimulus effects in comparisons of face-to-face and telephone surveys
We attempt to isolate the causes of mode effects on measurement in a comparison of face-to-face and telephone interviewing, distinguishing between effects caused by differences in the type of question stimulus used in each mode (audio vs. visual) and effects caused by other differences between the modes, notably, the presence or absence of the interviewer. We use data from an experiment conducted in the context of the European Social Survey. Differences in the stimulus did not lead to differential measurement error, but the presence or absence of the interviewer did. Telephone respondents were far more likely to give socially desirable responses than face-to-face respondents.
|Date of creation:||23 Nov 2012|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Publications Office, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ UK|
Web page: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: Publications Office, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ UK|
Web: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/publications/ Email:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Annette J‰ckle & Caroline Roberts & Peter Lynn, 2010.
"Assessing the Effect of Data Collection Mode on Measurement,"
International Statistical Review,
International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 3-20, April.
- JÃ¤ckle, Annette & Roberts, Caroline & Lynn, Peter, 2008. "Assessing the effect of data collection mode on measurement," ISER Working Paper Series 2008-08, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
- Anders Wikman & Bo Wärneryd, 1990. "Measurement errors in survey questions: Explaining response variability," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 199-212, March.
- Andy Peytchev & Lisa R. Carley-Baxter & Michele C. Black, 2011. "Multiple Sources of Nonobservation Error in Telephone Surveys: Coverage and Nonresponse," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(1), pages 138-168, February.
- JÃ¤ckle, Annette & Roberts, Caroline & Lynn, Peter, 2006. "Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing: mode effects on data quality and likely causes: report on phase II of the ESS-Gallup mixed mode methodology project," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-41, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:iserwp:2012-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jonathan Nears)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.