Communication Networks, Hegemony, and Communicative Action
Communicative action now commonly takes place in electronically mediated global networks and the networks are a powerful form of social ordering. This article analyzes the different forms of power that operate in communicative networks and how these alter communicative action. It suggests that the more optimistic literature on global and network governance, arguing and bargaining, and soft norm generation has not taken these new modes of hegemony fully into account. An analysis of the possible forms of communicative freedom in networks rounds off the article.
|Date of creation:||02 Jun 2005|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.bath.ac.uk/esml/|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- David N King & Yue Ma, 2000. "Local authority provision versus club provision," Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 18(2), pages 207-223, April.
- Leanne Ma & Katerina Sherstyuk & Malcom Dowling & Oliver Hill, 2000.
"Altruism and Voluntary Provision of Public Goods,"
200013, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:conweb:p0015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sassan GHOLIAGHA)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.