IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eoe/escoet/escoe-tr-26.html

Review of Approaches to the Measurement of Public Sector Productivity Statistics

Author

Listed:
  • O'Mahony, Mary
  • Viernes, Mechelle
  • Weale, Martin

Abstract

Productivity is generally defined as a measure of the amount of output generated per unit of input. In many countries, public sector productivity has been assumed to be zero in the national accounts. The output of the government sector has been measured as equal in value to the total value of inputs. This output=input convention has increasingly come under scrutiny in recent years. The challenge is to devise alternative estimates based on output measurement in a public sector context – where collective services are provided and where there is, in most instances, no market transaction in services provided to individuals (Boyle, 2006). This report aims to provide a summary of approaches to defining and measuring public sector productivity. The first part of the paper begins with a review of international practices for a few national statistical institutes (NSIs) and Productivity Commissions where information was readily available from websites. This is followed by more general discussions of issues that impact on public sector productivity. We first consider the organization of public sector production which could feed into measurement. This draws heavily on a report reviewing measurement for the police, undertaken by The Productivity Institute (TPI). We then consider the question of weighting of outputs and quality adjustments. Next, we look at approaches that are based on outcomes rather than outputs and how to incorporate preventative measures. The final part contains some recommendations for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Mahony, Mary & Viernes, Mechelle & Weale, Martin, 2025. "Review of Approaches to the Measurement of Public Sector Productivity Statistics," Technical Reports escoe-tr-26, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence.
  • Handle: RePEc:eoe:escoet:escoe-tr-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.repository-escoe.com/id/eprint/60/1/ESCoE%20TR-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edwin Lau & Zsuzsanna Lonti & Rebecca Schultz, 2017. "Challenges in the Measurement of Public Sector Productivity in OECD 180," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 32, pages 180-195, Spring.
    2. Fred Foxton & Joe Grice & Richard Heys & James Lewis, 2019. "The Welfare Implications of Public Goods: Lessons from 10 years of Atkinson in the UK," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2019-11, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    3. Mary O’Mahony & Philip Stevens, 2009. "Output and productivity growth in the education sector: comparisons for the US and UK," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 177-194, June.
    4. Norman Gemmell & Patrick Nolan & Grant Scobie, 2017. "Public sector productivity: Quality adjusting sector-level data on New Zealand schools," Working Papers 2017/02, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carol Corrado & Mary O'Mahony & Lea Samek, 2020. "Measuring education services using lifetime incomes," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2020-02, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    2. Michael S. Christian, 2014. "Human Capital Accounting in the United States: Context, Measurement, and Application," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress, pages 461-491, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Josh Martin & Rebecca Riley, 2025. "Productivity measurement: Reassessing the production function from micro to macro," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 246-279, February.
    4. Michael Ertl & Matthias Schnetzer & Eva Six, 2025. "Österreichs Produktivitätstrategie im Fokus: Messung, Trends und Maßnahmen," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 51(2), pages 5-20.
    5. Katharine G. Abraham & Justine Mallatt, 2022. "Measuring Human Capital," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 103-130, Summer.
    6. Lili Kang & Fei Peng, 2012. "A selection analysis of returns to education in China," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 535-554, March.
    7. Patricia Cubi-Molla & Martin Buxton & Nancy Devlin, 2021. "Allocating Public Spending Efficiently: Is There a Need for a Better Mechanism to Inform Decisions in the UK and Elsewhere?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 635-644, September.
    8. Gamal Atallah & Aggey Semenov, 2018. "Technological Progress and Sectoral Shares," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 142-153, June.
    9. Shamohammadi, Mehdi & Oh, Dong-hyun, 2019. "Measuring the efficiency changes of private universities of Korea: A two-stage network data envelopment analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Barslund, Mikkel, 2012. "Recent Developments in Selected Education Indicators and their Relation to Europe 2020 Targets," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 220, pages 6-16, April.
    11. O’Mahony, Mary & Pastor, José Manuel & Peng, Fei & Serrano, Lorenzo & Hernández, Laura, 2012. "Output growth in the post‐compulsory education sector: the European experience," MPRA Paper 44016, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Michael S. Christian, 2011. "Human Capital Accounting in the United States: Context, Measurement, and Application," BEA Working Papers 0073, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    13. Diego Muniz Benedetti & Diana Vaz Lima, 2022. "Micro-Level Public Entities’ Efficiency Reporting Using Combined Adaptation of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) and Free Disposable Hull (FDH) Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1121-1138, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H40 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - General
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eoe:escoet:escoe-tr-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Communications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escoeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.