IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/67478.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Whose side are you on? Exploring the role of perspective taking on third-party’s reactions to workplace deviance

Author

Listed:
  • Fiori, M.
  • Krings, F.
  • Kleinlogel, E. P.
  • Reich, Tara C.

Abstract

We introduce perspective taking as an antecedent of third-party reactions to different forms of workplace deviance. Varying the perspective taken by third-parties (perpetrator; other’s perspective) and the type of workplace deviance (moderate organizational deviance; severe interpersonal deviance), we show that third-parties who take the perpetrator’s perspective perceive the incident as less of a moral violation, make less internal, and more external attributions for the perpetrator’s behavior, which in turn reduces endorsement of punishment. Findings were consistent across the four studies and not affected by the target (organization or individual) or the severity of the deviance. The mediation analysis was supported by the instrumental variable method (Studies 1 and 2) and the concurrent double randomization design (Studies 3a and 3b).

Suggested Citation

  • Fiori, M. & Krings, F. & Kleinlogel, E. P. & Reich, Tara C., 2016. "Whose side are you on? Exploring the role of perspective taking on third-party’s reactions to workplace deviance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67478, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:67478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67478/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    workplace aggression; perspective taking; attribution; self-serving bias; bystander; observers; experimental mediation; instrumental variable method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:67478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.