IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/6194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Driven to swim with the tide?: urban redevelopment and community participation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shin, Hyun Bang

Abstract

Over the last decade, there has been growing attention to the issue of neighbourhood governance and community participation in China. The focus has been on the extent to which community involvement in rule-making and decision-making processes could be promoted. The issue of community participation in urban redevelopment, however, has received little attention. Urban redevelopment in contemporary Chinese cities is taking place on an unprecedented scale, dissolving long-standing local communities and demolishing poverty-stricken neighbourhoods. Examining the case of Beijing, this paper questions current redevelopment planning and residents’ appeal procedures. It considers the extent to which local communities in dilapidated neighbourhoods have difficulty making an impact on decisions affecting their neighbourhoods’ redevelopment. The paper considers the extent to which local residents could express discontent and put forward ‘rightful claims’. The paper concludes that community participation in neighbourhood redevelopment remains at the bottom of the ladder of participation, and that the vested interests of local authorities and developers in urban redevelopment projects restrict poor residents’ active participation in decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin, Hyun Bang, 2008. "Driven to swim with the tide?: urban redevelopment and community participation in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6194, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:6194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/6194/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donggen Wang & Si-Ming Li, 2004. "Housing Preferences in a Transitional Housing System: The Case of Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 69-87, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ngai Ming Yip & Hoai Anh Tran, 2016. "Is ‘gentrification’ an analytically useful concept for Vietnam? A case study of Hanoi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 490-505, February.
    2. Hyun Bang Shin, 2009. "Residential Redevelopment and the Entrepreneurial Local State: The Implications of Beijing’s Shifting Emphasis on Urban Redevelopment Policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(13), pages 2815-2839, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donggen Wang & Jiukun Li & Harry Timmermans, 2004. "Measuring Bifurcation Points in Choice Behavior: Principles and Illustration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(6), pages 1125-1138, June.
    2. Cecilia Wong & Wei Zheng & Miao Qiao, 2020. "Urban expansion and neighbourhood commuting patterns in the Beijing metropolitan region: A multilevel analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(13), pages 2773-2793, October.
    3. Xiangming Chen & Jiaming Sun, 2007. "Untangling a Global–Local Nexus: Sorting Out Residential Sorting in Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(10), pages 2324-2345, October.
    4. Suhong Zhou & Zhidong Wu & Luping Cheng, 2013. "The Impact of Spatial Mismatch on Residents in Low-income Housing Neighbourhoods: A Study of the Guangzhou Metropolis, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1817-1835, July.
    5. Rohayu Ab Majid & Rosli Said, 2015. "Public Preferences towards Residential Placement in a Township Area: Case Study of Malaysia," LARES lares_2015_1196-1386-1-rv, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    6. Aline Chiabai & Stephen Platt & Wadim Strielkowski, 2014. "Eliciting Users' Preferences for Cultural Heritage and Tourism-Related E-Services: A Tale of Three European Cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(2), pages 263-277, April.
    7. repec:cep:sticas:/130 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Hong Hu & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer, 2015. "Planning Support in Estimating Green Housing Opportunities for Different Socioeconomic Groups in Nanjing, China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(2), pages 316-337, April.
    9. Marois, Guillaume & Lord, Sébastien & Morency, Catherine, 2019. "A mixed logit model analysis of residential choices of the young-elderly in the Montreal metropolitan area," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-149.
    10. Meimei Wang & Yongchun Yang & Mengqin Liu & Huailiang Yu, 2021. "Intergenerational Factors Influencing Household Cohabitation in Urban China: Chengdu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Yang Hu & Rory Coulter, 2017. "Living space and psychological well-being in urban China: Differentiated relationships across socio-economic gradients," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 911-929, April.
    12. Li, Chunjiang & Zhang, Yan & Chai, Yanwei, 2021. "Do spatial factors outweigh institutional factors? Changes in influencing factors of home-work separation from 2007 to 2017 in Beijing," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Caplan, Arthur J. & Akhundjanov, Sherzod B. & Toll, Kristopher, 2021. "Measuring heterogeneous preferences for residential amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Hyun Bang Shin, 2008. "Driven to swim with the tide? Urban redevelopment and community participation in China," CASE Papers case130, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    15. Donggen Wang & Fenglong Wang, 2016. "Contributions of the Usage and Affective Experience of the Residential Environment to Residential Satisfaction," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 42-60, January.
    16. Hong Hu & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer, 2014. "The willingness to pay for green apartments: The case of Nanjing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(16), pages 3459-3478, December.
    17. Si-Ming Li & Yu-Ling Song, 2009. "Redevelopment, Displacement, Housing Conditions, and Residential Satisfaction: A Study of Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1090-1108, May.
    18. Anna Alberini & Alberto Longo & Patrizia Riganti, 2006. "Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale," Working Papers 2006.137, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    19. Alberini, Anna & Longo, Alberto & Riganti, Patrizia, 2006. "Using Surveys to Compare the Public's and Decision-makers' Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale," Sustainability Indicators and Environmental Valuation Working Papers 12221, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    20. Maciej A Orzechowski & Theo A Arentze & Aloys W J Borgers & Harry J P Timmermans, 2008. "The Applicability of Bayesian Belief Networks for Measuring User Preferences: Some Numerical Simulations," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(3), pages 521-534, June.
    21. Vincenzo Del Giudice & Pierfrancesco De Paola & Torrieri Francesca & Peter J. Nijkamp & Aviad Shapira, 2019. "Real Estate Investment Choices and Decision Support Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    neighbourhood governance; community participation; urban redevelopment; ‘rightful claims’; Beijing; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:6194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.