IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/127391.html

Talking across purposes [sic] in social investing: standardising boundary objects in times of crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Morley, Julia

Abstract

Boundary objects are ambiguous terms that are useful in enabling parties with different incentives, belief systems, or cultural commitments to collaborate. However, the misunderstandings that arise due to this ambiguity will eventually prompt the initiation of a process of standardisation intended to make the meanings of terms more precise to all parties, thereby enabling collaboration to continue. Existing theories of standardisation of boundary objects identify how meanings of terms are renegotiated during standardisation but do not refer to the effect of background conditions — stable or unstable — on this process. This study uses interview and documentary evidence to examine the standardisation of boundary objects between 2010 and 2023 in the UK market for social investment and identifies how this differed between the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings suggest that the process of standardisation of boundary objects is affected by the context in which it takes place, in particular, whether it occurs during periods of stability or during periods of instability.

Suggested Citation

  • Morley, Julia, 2026. "Talking across purposes [sic] in social investing: standardising boundary objects in times of crisis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127391, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/127391/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Power, Michael, 2015. "How accounting begins: object formation and the accretion of infrastructure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64324, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Julia Morley, 2021. "The ethical status of social impact bonds," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 44-60, January.
    3. Nicholls, Alex, 2010. "Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 394-415, May.
    4. Matthew Hall & Yuval Millo, 2018. "Choosing an Accounting Method to Explain Public Policy: Social Return on Investment and UK Non-profit Sector Policy," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 339-361, March.
    5. Power, Michael, 2015. "How accounting begins: Object formation and the accretion of infrastructure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 43-55.
    6. Hall, Matthew, 2014. "Evaluation logics in the third sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 46365, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Miller, Peter & Napier, Christopher, 1993. "Genealogies of calculation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(7-8), pages 631-647.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kornberger Martin & Pflueger Dane & Mouritsen Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures : Accounting for platform organization," Post-Print hal-02276737, HAL.
    2. Pflueger, Dane, 2016. "Knowing patients: The customer survey and the changing margins of accounting in healthcare," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-33.
    3. Kornberger, Martin & Pflueger, Dane & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 79-95.
    4. Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2020. "A pragmatist approach to audit practices: two cases of technical dialog from nuclear risk governance in France," Post-Print halshs-03721410, HAL.
    5. Faulconbridge, James R. & Muzio, Daniel, 2021. "Valuation devices and the dynamic legitimacy-performativity nexus: The case of PEP in the English legal profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Rebecca Vine, 2020. "Riskwork in the construction of Heathrow Terminal 2," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. Pflueger, Dane & Palermo, Tommaso & Martinez, Daniel, 2019. "Thinking infrastructure and the organization of markets: the creation of a legal market for cannabis in Colorado," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Martinez, Daniel E. & Cooper, David J., 2019. "Assembling performance measurement through engagement," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Vargha, Zsuzsanna, 2016. "Note from the editor: The results of accounting," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(2), pages 2-6.
    11. Sebastian D. Becker & Martin Messner & Utz Schäffer, 2020. "The Interplay of Core and Peripheral Actors in the Trajectory of an Accounting Innovation: Insights from beyond Budgeting," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2224-2256, December.
    12. Johansson-Berg, Tobias & Siverbo, Sven, 2025. "The emergence of control archetypes: Theorization of trust-based control in the Swedish public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Gebreiter, Florian, 2022. "A profession in peril? University corporatization, performance measurement and the sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Claire Li & David Freeborn, 2025. "Reconfiguring Digital Accountability: AI-Powered Innovations and Transnational Governance in a Postnational Accounting Context," Papers 2507.00288, arXiv.org.
    15. Chua, Wai Fong & Fiedler, Tanya & Boedker, Christina, 2024. "Projecting, infrastructuring and calculating: From an In vitro to an In vivo carbon market," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Claire Li & David Peter Wallis Freeborn, 2025. "Exploring AI-powered Digital Innovations from A Transnational Governance Perspective: Implications for Market Acceptance and Digital Accountability Accountability," Papers 2504.20215, arXiv.org.
    17. Carrión, Elena & Larrinaga, Carlos & Rigling Gallagher, Deborah, 2025. "Carbon accounting for the translation of net-zero targets into business operations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(2).
    18. Luis Araujo & Katy Mason, 2021. "Markets, infrastructures and infrastructuring markets," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 240-251, December.
    19. Graaf, Johan & Johed, Gustav, 2020. "“Reverse brokering” and the consumption of accounting: A broker desk ethnography of an investment case," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Powell, Lisa & Ghio, Alessandro & McGuigan, Nicholas, 2026. "Nurturing diversity in accounting through “Queering” accounting pedagogy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.