IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/126955.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Repair work in raced welfare capitalism: community health workers in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Hanrieder, Tine

Abstract

In modern capitalism, the costs of care and social reproduction are widely externalised to women in households, but also to (women in) community organisations. This article analyses the role of community medicine in the US, and in particular the labour and struggles of community health workers (CHWs). Highlighting the gendered and raced inequalities of US welfare capitalism, I explore how CHWs sustain individuals and communities through three main forms of repair work: Safety net plugging is the often-invisible work of addressing unmet community needs; bridging is the work of intermediating between (punitive) state authorities and oppressed communities; and transforming lived experience is the devalued personal work of turning discrimination into care. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork in the US with a focus on California, my findings stress the laboriousness of caring in a punitive welfare state, and the devaluation of doing so in a ‘meritocratic', credentials-centred social order. I argue that CHWs' repair work might be a cost effective ‘fix’ for the health system, but that their struggle for professional recognition also challenges ingrained, racialised concepts of merit and professionalism. Their struggles connect with broader debates about reparative justice, repair, and labour value in our current socio-ecological crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanrieder, Tine, 2025. "Repair work in raced welfare capitalism: community health workers in the United States," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126955, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:126955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126955/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gurminder K. Bhambra & John Holmwood, 2018. "Colonialism, Postcolonialism and the Liberal Welfare State," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 574-587, September.
    2. Alessandra Mezzadri & Susan Newman & Sara Stevano, 2022. "Feminist global political economies of work and social reproduction," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 1783-1803, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin Lorne, 2024. "Repoliticising national policy mobilities: Resisting the Americanization of universal healthcare," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(2), pages 231-249, March.
    2. Elise Klein, 2022. "Transfer State: The Idea of a Guaranteed Income and the Politics of Redistribution in Modern Britain, by Peter Sloman (Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 320. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/978019881326," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 98(321), pages 236-237, June.
    3. Paidipaty, Poornima & Ramos Pinto, Pedro, 2021. "Revisiting the “Great Levelling”: the limits of Piketty’s Capital and Ideology for understanding the rise of late 20th century inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110941, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Plomien, Ania & Schwartz, Gregory, 2023. "Welfare as flourishing social reproduction: Polish and Ukrainian migrant workers in a market-participation society," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118841, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Goodwin, Geoff, 2022. "Double movements and disembedded economies: a response to Richard Sandbrook," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113686, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Elise Klein, 2021. "Unpaid care, welfare conditionality and expropriation," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1475-1489, July.
    7. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    8. Geraldine Pratt & Caleb Johnston & Kelsey Johnson, 2023. "Robots and care of the ageing self: An emerging economy of loneliness," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 2051-2066, November.
    9. Dunja Krause & Dimitris Stevis & Katja Hujo & Edouard Morena, 2022. "Just transitions for a new eco-social contract: analysing the relations between welfare regimes and transition pathways," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(3), pages 367-382, August.
    10. Erin Lockwood, 2021. "The international political economy of global inequality," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 421-445, March.
    11. Jane Freedman & Nina Sahraoui & Elsa Tyszler, 2022. "Asylum, Racism, and the Structural Production of Sexual Violence against Racialised Women in Exile in Paris," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    racial capitalism; care; social reproduction; labour; global health; community health workers; welfare state;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:126955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.