IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/124210.html

The 30-billion-dollar distribution markups and taxes of pharmaceuticals in Latin American countries: impact, options, and trade-offs

Author

Listed:
  • Leon, Giovanny
  • Gonzalez-Pier, Eduardo
  • Kanavos, Panos
  • Ruiz de Castilla, Eva Maria
  • Machinicki, Gerardo

Abstract

Objectives: The World Health Organization provides 10 specific guidelines for managing the prices of pharmaceutical products. Many of those are widely known and used such as reference pricing, value-based pricing, price transparency, and tendering. Less attention and knowledge is concentrated in markup regulation across the pharmaceutical supply chain and distribution and in tax exemptions or reductions. This article quantifies the impact of these price components in the Latin American (LatAm) region and places the findings in the context of economic theory and international policy experiences. Methods: 2020 retail pharmaceutical sales data from 8 major LatAm markets covered in the IQVIA database were decomposed into ex-factory, distributor markups, and taxes using price build up information and the Price Decipher Methodology developed by the Novartis Global Pricing Governance and Negotiation team. The findings were reviewed by an international panel representing academia, health policy, health economics, patient, and industry. Results: The ex-factory market value of the analyzed markets was $49 billion. Distribution markups added $20 billion and taxes a further $10.5 billion. This represented a 63% increase over ex-factory prices, considered high if compared with 24% for an international benchmark of 35 ex-LatAm countries. Reducing markups for these LatAm countries to 24% would represent up to $19 billion in savings for payers and patients. Conclusions: There is potential for significant cost reductions associated with tax and distribution markup refinements in the LatAm retail pharmaceutical market. National policies should be informed by additional context-specific research for effective implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Leon, Giovanny & Gonzalez-Pier, Eduardo & Kanavos, Panos & Ruiz de Castilla, Eva Maria & Machinicki, Gerardo, 2024. "The 30-billion-dollar distribution markups and taxes of pharmaceuticals in Latin American countries: impact, options, and trade-offs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:124210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/124210/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:idb:brikps:9152 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Alaimo, Veronica & Cafagna, Gianluca & Elacqua, Gregory & Giles Álvarez, Laura & Izquierdo, Alejandro & Keefer, Philip & Martínez Von der Fecht, Matías & Vuletin, Guillermo & Moreno-Serra, Rodrigo & P, 2018. "Better Spending for Better Lives: How Latin America and the Caribbean Can Do More with Less," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 9152, November.
    3. Copenhagen Economics, 2007. "Study on reduced VAT applied to goods and services in the Member States of the EU," Taxation Studies 0018, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    4. Tom Harris & David Phillips & Ross Warwick & Maya Goldman & Jon Jellema & Karolina Goraus & Gabriela Inchauste, 2018. "Redistribution via VAT and cash transfers: an assessment in four low and middle income countries," IFS Working Papers W18/11, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Bird,Richard & Gendron,Pierre-Pascal, 2011. "The VAT in Developing and Transitional Countries," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107401440, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sijbren Cnossen, 2015. "Mobilizing VAT revenues in African countries," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 22(6), pages 1077-1108, December.
    2. Katri Kosonen, 2012. "Regressivity of environmental taxation: myth or reality?," Taxation Papers 32, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    3. Abdramane Camara, 2023. "The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Tax Revenue," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(1), pages 168-190, March.
    4. Giesecke, James A. & Nhi, Tran Hoang, 2010. "Modelling value-added tax in the presence of multi-production and differentiated exemptions," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 156-173, April.
    5. Jun Ma & Yulia V. Leontyeva & Alexey Y. Domnikov, 2022. "Analyze the impact of the transition from business tax to VAT on the tax burden of transport enterprises in various regions of China," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 8(2), pages 199-211.
    6. Eduardo Lora & Johanna Fajardo-Gonz�lez, 2016. "Employment and taxes in Latin America: An empirical study of the effects of payroll, corporate income and value-added taxes on labor outcomes," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 35(Especial ), pages 75-117.
    7. Naoufel Mahfoudh & Imen Gmach, 2021. "The Effects of Fiscal Effort in Tunisia: An Evidence from the ARDL Bound Testing Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Angelica BACESCU-CARBUNARU & Monica CONDRUZ-BACESCU, 2011. "The Interdependence between the Level of Domestic Prices and the Price Level in the Developed Countries," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(3), pages 420-431, July.
    9. Kodjo Adandohoin, 2021. "Tax transition in developing countries: do value added tax and excises really work?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 379-424, May.
    10. Abdramane Camara, 2019. "The effect of foreign direct investment on tax revenue in developing countries," Working Papers hal-03188025, HAL.
    11. Cusato Novelli, Antonio & Barcia, Giancarlo, 2021. "Sovereign Risk, Public Investment and the Fiscal Policy Stance," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Pierre Bachas & Lucie Gadenne & Anders Jensen, 2024. "Informality, Consumption Taxes, and Redistribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(5), pages 2604-2634.
    13. L. An & C. Hu & Yong Tan, 2017. "Regional effects of export tax rebate on exporting firms: Evidence from China," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 774-798, September.
    14. World Bank, "undated". "Recovering Growth [Recobrar el crecimiento]," World Bank Publications - Reports 36331, The World Bank Group.
    15. Ehtisham Ahmad, 2010. "Design of a VAT for the GCC Common Market," Chapters, in: Ehtisham Ahmad & Abdulrazak Al Faris (ed.), Fiscal Reforms in the Middle East, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Jon Bakija & Ivan Badinski, 2014. "Evidence on the Responsiveness of Export-Related VAT Evasion to VAT Rates in the EU," Department of Economics Working Papers 2014-06, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    17. Sijbren Cnossen, 2017. "VAT and Agriculture: Lessons from Europe," CPB Discussion Paper 341, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    18. Shah, Jawad, 2026. "Using computerized information to enforce VAT: Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Fikri R. Arrachman & Riatu M. Qibthiyyah, 2018. "The Relationship of VAT Rate and Revenues in the Case of Informality," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 64, pages 73-96, Juni.
    20. António Afonso & Gabriela Baquero Fraga, 2024. "Government spending efficiency in Latin America," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 51(1), pages 127-160, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:124210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.