IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/118559.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The rhetorical power of aid for trade: UK aid in the age of Brexit and Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • Melvin, Jennifer

Abstract

The UK is a global leader in Aid for Trade (AFT). Aid for Trade discourse frames it as a solution to development challenges and key to building trade relationships. This article examines the rhetorical value of this framing in pursuit of myriad interests amidst Brexit, the Covid-19 pandemic, and changes to the UK’s aid budget and administration. It is informed by data from government documents and interviews with AFT and aid experts. This study finds that AFT discourse is used to justify the UK’s merging of diplomatic and development agendas and its new ‘Global Britain’ identity. Le Royaume-Uni est un chef de file en Aide pour le Commerce (APC). En effet, l'Aide pour le Commerce est reconnue comme un outil indispensable au développement international et comme une élement clé lors de l'établissement de relations commerciales. Cet article examine la valeur rhétorique de cette représentation dans la foulée de la présente redéfinition du rôle Britanique dans le cadre du Brexit, de la Pandémie de Covid-19 et des récents ajustements budgétaires apportés à l’aide internationale. Il s'appuie sur des données provenant tant de documents gouvernementaux, que d’entretiens avec des experts de l'APC et d’aide internationale britannique. Cette étude révèle que le discours de l'APC est utilisé pour justifier la fusion des programmes diplomatiques et d’aide internationale menant à la révision du rôle britannique mondial en sa nouvelle identité de « Grande-Bretagne mondiale ».

Suggested Citation

  • Melvin, Jennifer, 2024. "The rhetorical power of aid for trade: UK aid in the age of Brexit and Covid-19," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118559, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:118559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/118559/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myriam Dahman Saidi & Christina Wolf, 2011. "Recalibrating Development Co-operation: How Can African Countries Benefit from Emerging Partners?," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 302, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia, Ying & Chen, Muyang, 2023. "The Janus face of stateness: China's development-oriented equity investments in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Izumi Ohno, 2014. "Japanese Development Cooperation in a New Era: Recommendations for Network-Based Cooperation," GRIPS Discussion Papers 14-15, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    3. Shimomura, Yasutami & Ping, Wang, 2015. "Chains of Knowledge Creation and Emerging Donors," Working Papers 88, JICA Research Institute.
    4. Hisahiro Kondo, 2018. "Stagnation of Integration in Aid Administration in South Africa―Choices Between Norms, Interests and Power Balance―," Working Papers 167, JICA Research Institute.
    5. Sung-Mi Kim, 2017. "International Perceptions of South Korea as Development Partner: Attractions and Strategic Implications," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1086-1101, November.
    6. David Dole & Steven Lewis-Workman & Dennis D. Trinidad & Xianbin Yao, 2021. "The Rise of Asian Aid Donors: Recipient-to-Donor Transition and Implications for International Aid Regime," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 13(1), pages 58-80, January.
    7. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    8. Helmut Reisen, 2015. "Will the AIIB and the NDB Help Reform Multilateral Development Banking?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 6(3), pages 297-304, September.
    9. Kondoh, Hisahiro, 2015. "Convergence of Aid Models in Emerging Donors?Learning Processes, Norms and Identities, and Recipients," Working Papers 106, JICA Research Institute.
    10. Muyang Chen, 2021. "China–Japan development finance competition and the revival of mercantilism," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 811-828, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aid for Trade; sociology of development; Brexit; Covid-19; aid policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:118559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.