Choice Experiments: identifying preferences or production functions?
This paper presents an alternative perspective on the process by which respondents consider options within choice experiments. Building on the “new” model of consumer demand by Stigler and Becker (1977), it suggests that the attributes within choice experiments are not valued directly, but are used to generate higher level “constructs” (i.e. improvement in the environment) which are then valued. The implication is that what are currently viewed as marginal utilities of attributes are in fact marginal utilities of an environmental outcome mixed with (subjective) marginal productivity of the attribute to achieving the environmental outcome. It is suggested the Hierarchical Information Integration methods may allow one to separately identify the utility and production functions, and identify individual heterogeneity therein
|Date of creation:||Nov 2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
Web page: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/research_units/eerh/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:eenhrr:0940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Crawford Webmaster)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.