IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Choice Experiments: identifying preferences or production functions?

Listed author(s):
  • Fiona Gibson


    (Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Australia)

  • Michael Burton


    (Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Australia)

This paper presents an alternative perspective on the process by which respondents consider options within choice experiments. Building on the “new” model of consumer demand by Stigler and Becker (1977), it suggests that the attributes within choice experiments are not valued directly, but are used to generate higher level “constructs” (i.e. improvement in the environment) which are then valued. The implication is that what are currently viewed as marginal utilities of attributes are in fact marginal utilities of an environmental outcome mixed with (subjective) marginal productivity of the attribute to achieving the environmental outcome. It is suggested the Hierarchical Information Integration methods may allow one to separately identify the utility and production functions, and identify individual heterogeneity therein

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University in its series Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports with number 0940.

in new window

Date of creation: Nov 2009
Handle: RePEc:een:eenhrr:0940
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Crawford Building, Lennox Crossing, Building #132, Canberra ACT 2601

Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:eenhrr:0940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CAP Web Team)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.