IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecr/col093/34427.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Challenging the State: crisis and innovation in Latin America and Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Grindle, Merilee S

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Grindle, Merilee S, 1997. "Challenging the State: crisis and innovation in Latin America and Africa," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34427, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
  • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col093:34427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/34427
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajapatirana, Sarath, 1995. "Post trade liberalization policy and institutional challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1465, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kohnert, Dirk, 2004. "Are Non-state Actors Better Innovators? The Ambiguous Role of Non-state Actors in the Transition Process: The Case of Benin and Madagascar," MPRA Paper 977, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grindle, Merilee S, 1997. "Demanding a supply of good government: a coalition for the reform of the State?," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34429, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Ascher, William, 1997. "Strategic planning of institutional reform: improving policy outcomes through more accountable structures," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34430, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. -, 1997. "The Caribbean quest; information paper," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 27688, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    4. Dunham, David & Kelegam, Saman, 1997. "Does leadership matter in the economic reform process? Liberalization and governance in Sri Lanka, 1989-1993," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 179-190, February.
    5. Mottley, Wendell, 1997. "Global framework for policy reform: how do we use it to manage development," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34435, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Guash, J. Luis & Rajapatirana, Sarath, 1998. "Total strangers or soul mates? - antidumping and competition policies in Latin America and the Caribbean," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1958, The World Bank.
    7. Meins, Bertus J, 1997. "Macroeconomic management: is it working?," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34434, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    8. Dookeran, Winston, 1997. "Caribbean development: the premises of an emerging agenda," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34426, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    9. Holden, Paul, 1997. "Emerging economic issues in Latin America: a second generation agenda," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34436, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    10. Poon, Auliana, 1997. "New implementation challenges: a flexible specialisation paradigm," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34428, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    11. Nicholls, Shelton, 1997. "External economic performance and the new global agenda," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34433, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Sarath Rajapatirana, 2002. "Exceptional Protection: The Way Ahead— A Developing Country Perspective," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Alvaro Forteza & Daniel Buquet & Mario Ibarburu & Jorge Lanzaro & Andrés Pereyra & Eduardo Siandra & Marcel Vaillant, 2003. "Understanding reform. The Uruguayan case," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0603, Department of Economics - dECON.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col093:34427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.