IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consistency conditions for affine term structure models


  • Sergei Levendorskii


Affine term structure models are widely applied for pricing of bonds and interest rate derivatives but the consistency of affine term structure models (ATSM) in cases when the short rate may be unbounded from below remains essentially an open question. The main stress in the classification paper Dai and Singleton (2000) is on the overdeterminacy of many ATSM models; however, for wide regions in the parameter's space, standard ATSM models may be inconsistent, and the following issues must be addressed. First, the standard approach to ATSM is based on the reduction to the Riccati equations. The reduction uses the Feynman-Kac formula but the general Feynman-Kac theorem is easily applicable only when the short rate is bounded from below, which excludes many classes used in applications. Second, the solution to the bond pricing problem must be a decreasing function of any state variable for which the corresponding coefficients in the formula for the short rate is positive; the solution must also decrease as the time to maturity increases, if the tuple of state variables belongs to the region where the short rate is positive. In the paper, sufficient conditions for the application of the Feynman-Kac formula, and monotonicity of the bond price are derived, for wide classes of affine term structure models in the pure diffusion case. Necessary conditions for the monotonicity are derived as well. The results can be generalized for jump-diffusion processes. We consider a simple two-factor A_1(2) family, next more general A_1(n) family, and then the family A_2(3) (other families A_m(n) can be studied similarly), and derive, in terms of parameters of the model, I. simple necessary conditions for the decay of the bond price as a function of the time to maturity, in the region where the short rate is positive; II. sufficient conditions for the decay of the bond price; we do not know how wide is the gap between these conditions and the (unknown to us) necessary and sufficient conditions; III. sufficient conditions under which the reduction to the system of the Riccati equations can be justified. For A_1(2) family, and in many other cases, these condition are weaker than the necessary condition in (I). Remarks. a) Necessary and sufficient conditions for the decay of the bond price at infinity, and in a vicinity of 0, are easier to derive, and under these conditions, a ``numerical proof" of the monotonicity of the bond price on a large finite interval can be used to show that for given parameters' values, the model is consistent. b) As our study shows, for the family A_1(n), the monotonicity of the bond price in time to maturity is the main consistency problem for ATSM. On the other hand, should one use the model for a fixed (and sufficiently small) time to maturity then the model can be consistent on this time interval; and it is possible to derive sufficient condition for the decay of the bond price on a small interval near maturity, which depends on parameters of the model. c) When it is necessary to consider more general contingent claims, a sufficient condition for (III), in terms of the rate of growth of the pay-off at infinity, can be derived relatively easily, and the same is true of a necessary condition for the decay of the price. The sufficient conditions for the monotonicity will be more difficult to derive. d) It is plausible that in some empirical studies, the fitted ATSM is inconsistent in the sense that the monotonicity condition fails. It might be possible to construct an arbitrage strategy against a counterparty who uses an inconsistent model

Suggested Citation

  • Sergei Levendorskii, 2004. "Consistency conditions for affine term structure models," Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings 413, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:413

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. John C. Cox & Jonathan E. Ingersoll Jr. & Stephen A. Ross, 2005. "A Theory Of The Term Structure Of Interest Rates," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Theory Of Valuation, chapter 5, pages 129-164 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    3. Vasicek, Oldrich, 1977. "An equilibrium characterization of the term structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 177-188, November.
    4. D. Duffie & D. Filipovic & W. Schachermayer, 2002. "Affine Processes and Application in Finance," NBER Technical Working Papers 0281, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. George Chacko, 2002. "Pricing Interest Rate Derivatives: A General Approach," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 195-241, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Cheridito, Patrick & Filipovic, Damir & Kimmel, Robert L., 2007. "Market price of risk specifications for affine models: Theory and evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 123-170, January.
    2. Sergei Levendorskiń¨, 2006. "Consistency conditions for affine term structure models," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 207-224, March.

    More about this item


    Affine term structure models; consistency conditions;

    JEL classification:

    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.