IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eca/wpaper/2013-222886.html

David vs. Goliath

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Parenti

Abstract

This paper develops a model where monopolistically competitive and oligopolistic firms coexist.The model is characterized by a monopolistically competitive fringe and a few multi-product firmswhich decide to be large or not at equilibrium. Conditions are derived for the coexistence of bothtypes of firms: heterogeneity in production efficiency, captured by economies of scope for large firms,appears as a necessary condition for them to coexist at equilibrium. The entry of a large firm raises theaverage price decreasing thereby consumer surplus despite an increase in the total number of varieties.An application to international trade is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Parenti, 2015. "David vs. Goliath," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2015-53, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/222886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/222886/3/2015-53-PARENTI-david.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ken-Ichi Shimomura & Jacques-François Thisse, 2012. "Competition among the big and the small," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(2), pages 329-347, June.
    2. Gene M. Grossman & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, 2010. "External Economies and International Trade Redux," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(2), pages 829-858.
    3. d'Aspremont, Claude & Dos Santos Ferreira, Rodolphe & Gerard-Varet, Louis-Andre, 1996. "On the Dixit-Stiglitz Model of Monopolistic Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 623-629, June.
    4. Yang, Xiaokai & Heijdra, Ben J, 1993. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(1), pages 295-301, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haque, Qazi & Pavlov, Oscar & Weder, Mark, 2025. "Endogenous business cycles with small and large firms," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Thisse, Jacques-François, 1999. "Monopolistic Competition, Multiproduct Firms and Optimum Product Diversity," CEPR Discussion Papers 2151, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Brito, Paulo B. & Costa, Luís F. & Dixon, Huw, 2013. "Non-smooth dynamics and multiple equilibria in a Cournot–Ramsey model with endogenous markups," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 2287-2306.
    4. Niroth Chhy, 2018. "A Simple Extension to the Dixit-Stiglitz Framework to Allow for Strategic Interaction," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(2), pages 1187-1197.
    5. Jacques-François Thisse & Philip Ushchev, 2018. "Monopolistic competition without apology," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I, chapter 5, pages 93-136, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Anu Kovarikova Arro, 2005. "Globalization, Increasing Returns in Component Production, and the Pattern of Trade," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp265, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    7. Marco Di Cintio, 2015. "Intra-Sector and Inter-Sector Competition in a Model of Growth," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(116), pages 74-89.
    8. Ferdinand Rauch, 2008. "An explanation for the inverted-U relationship between competition and innovation," Vienna Economics Papers 0813, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    9. Cellini, Roberto & Lambertini, Luca & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P., 2020. "Strategic inattention, delegation and endogenous market structure," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Junius, Karsten, 1996. "Limits to industrial agglomeration," Kiel Working Papers 762, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    11. Viktors Stebunovs & Fabio Ghironi, 2008. "The Domestic and International Effects of Financial Deregulation," 2008 Meeting Papers 676, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    12. Claude d’Aspremont & Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira, 2016. "Oligopolistic vs. monopolistic competition: Do intersectoral effects matter?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 299-324, June.
    13. J. Peter Neary, 2000. "Monopolistic competition and international trade theory," Working Papers 200025, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    14. Nigar Hashimzade & Gareth Donald Myles, 2017. "Do Corporate Environmental Contributions Justify the Public Interest Defence?," CESifo Working Paper Series 6755, CESifo.
    15. Jacques-François Thisse & Filipp Ushchev, 2018. "Monopolistic competition without apology," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/387748, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Cacciatore, Matteo & Ghironi, Fabio & Stebunovs, Viktors, 2015. "The domestic and international effects of interstate U.S. banking," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 171-187.
    17. d’Aspremont, Claude & Dos Santos Ferreira, Rodolphe, 2017. "The Dixit–Stiglitz economy with a ‘small group’ of firms: A simple and robust equilibrium markup formula," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 729-739.
    18. Sergey Kokovin & Mathieu Parenti & Jacques-Francois Thisse & Philip Ushchev, 2017. "On the Dilution of Market Power," HSE Working papers WP BRP 176/EC/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Josheski, Dushko & Koteski, Cane & Lazarov, Darko, 2011. "Monopolistic competition: Critical evaluation the theory of monopolistic competition with specific reference to the seminal 1977 paper by Dixit and Stiglitz," MPRA Paper 33802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. BEHRENS, Kristian & MURATA, Yasusada, 2005. "General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: CRRA versus CARA," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2005033, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/222886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arulbbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.