IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dij/wpfarg/1090501.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Choix de l’auditeur externe, honoraires d’audit et gouvernance des entreprises françaises

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Nekhili

    () (Université de Reims Champagne Ardennes)

  • Wafa Masmoudi

    (Université de Sfax (Tunisie))

  • Dhikra Chebbi Nehkili

    (Université de Bourgogne)

Abstract

(VF)L’objectif de cette recherche est d’examiner la relation entre la taille de l’auditeur externe et le montant des honoraires d’audit. Le choix de l’auditeur est, quant à lui, expliqué par les caractéristiques de gouvernance et de propriété de la firme. Sur la base d’un échantillon de 96 entreprises françaises cotées pendant la période 2004-2006, nous appliquons, pour tenir compte de cette double relation, un modèle de sélection de type Heckman. Les résultats du modèle montrent principalement le rôle prépondérant des comités d’audit indépendants dans la sélection des auditeurs de grande taille et la présence d’une prime d’audit en faveur des auditeurs de grande taille. (VA)The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the external auditor size and the audit fees. The selection of an external auditor is, however, explained by governance and ownership characteristics of the firm. Based on a sample of 96 listed French firms over the period 2004-2006, we use, to take account of this dual relationship, a Heckman’s selection model. Results show mainly the important role of independent audit committees in the selection of big auditors and the presence of a “Big auditor” premium.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Nekhili & Wafa Masmoudi & Dhikra Chebbi Nehkili, 2009. "Choix de l’auditeur externe, honoraires d’audit et gouvernance des entreprises françaises," Working Papers CREGO 1090501, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
  • Handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1090501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/wp/1090501.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenny Goodwin-Stewart & Pamela Kent, 2006. "Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(3), pages 387-404.
    2. Charles Piot, 2001. "Agency costs and audit quality: evidence from France," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 461-499.
    3. Yi Meng Chen & Robyn Moroney & Keith Houghton, 2005. "Audit committee composition and the use of an industry specialist audit firm," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 45(2), pages 217-239.
    4. Nathalie Gonthier-Besacier & Alain Schatt, 2006. "Determinants of Audit Fees for French Quoted Firms," Working Papers CREGO 1060301, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    5. Velury, Uma & Reisch, John T & O'Reilly, Dennis M, 2003. "Institutional Ownership and the Selection of Industry Specialist Auditors," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 35-48, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lobna Loukil, 2010. "Conséquences De L'Adoption Des Normes Internationales «Ifrs» Sur Le Coût D'Audit Financier," Post-Print hal-00481517, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    auditeur externe; Big Four; honoraires d’audit; gouvernance; structure de propriété; external auditor; audit fees; governance; ownership structure.;

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1090501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angèle RENAUD). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.