IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csc/ircrwp/201708.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technostress.Test di valutazione: il modello SOGI/Technostress. Evaluation test: SOGI Model

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This work develops a model (SOGI) for the evaluation of technostress in all kind of workplaces. The aim is to understand the causal determinants of technostress and it is based on models already developed by Nathan and Ayyagary. SOGI is specifically devoted to the evaluation of risk deriving from the use of ICT (Information and Communication Techonology). It considers technologies , independently of possible purposes. The model is presented in a descriptive way; starting from the technological features the evaluator can understand those aspects of a technology that can become technostressors and therefore can determine the emergence of technostress problems in the exposed worker: work satisfaction, organizational engagement, and continued commitment can indicate the presence of technostress in a worker. Moderators, individual differences, and inhibitors are the factors that can respectively reduce / increase the technostressors' danger and the effects of technostressors. Some examples of application of the SOGI model are presented. The possibilities for the SOGI implementation (test) are presented in annex.

Suggested Citation

  • Oriana Ippoliti & Silvio Giovarruscio, 2017. "Technostress.Test di valutazione: il modello SOGI/Technostress. Evaluation test: SOGI Model," IRCrES Working Paper 201708, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    • Handle: RePEc:csc:ircrwp:201708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ircres.cnr.it/images/wp/wp_08_2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. René Riedl & Harald Kindermann & Andreas Auinger & Andrija Javor, 2012. "Technostress from a Neurobiological Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(2), pages 61-69, April.
    2. Woo Jin Lee & Inho Hwang, 2021. "Sustainable Information Security Behavior Management: An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Employees’ Voice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    4. Constanţa POPESCU & Oana Mihaela ILIE & Georgiana Tatiana BONDAC, 2018. "The "Techno-stress" Phenomenon and Its Consequences in the Modern Organization," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Tomita CIULEI & Gabriel GORGHIU (ed.), CATES 2017, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 22, pages 224-238, Editura Lumen.
    5. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    6. Francesco Pace & Giulia Sciotto & Naomi Alexia Randazzo & Vincenza Macaluso, 2022. "Teachers’ Work-Related Well-Being in Times of COVID-19: The Effects of Technostress and Online Teaching," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-10, October.
    7. You-Kyung Lee, 2021. "Impacts of Digital Technostress and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy on Fintech Usage Intention of Chinese Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Shanshan Zhang & Fengchun Huang & Yuting Zhang & Qiwen Li, 2023. "A Person-Environment Fit Model to Explain Information and Communication Technologies-Enabled After-Hours Work-Related Interruptions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Sadia Shakeel & Muhammad Majid Khan & Rao Aamir Ali Khan & Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, 2022. "Linking Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy and Burnout of Teachers in Public Schools: Does School Climate Play a Moderating Role?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 19-39, March.
    10. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Joan Boada-Grau, 2020. "Teacher Technostress in the Chilean School System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Globočnik Žunac, Ana & Kocijan, Samanta & Martinčević, Ivana, 2021. "Impact of Modern Communication Channels on Business Processes," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2021), Hybrid Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Hybrid Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, 9-10 September 2021, pages 44-51, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    12. Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Steponas Jonušauskas, 2013. "Silent issues of ICT era: impact of techno-stress to the work and life balance of employees," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(2), pages 108-115, December.
    13. Aini Farmania & Riska Dwinda Elsyah & Ananda Fortunisa, 2022. "The Phenomenon of Technostress during the COVID-19 Pandemic Due to Work from Home in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Chiara Consiglio & Nicoletta Massa & Valentina Sommovigo & Luigi Fusco, 2023. "Techno-Stress Creators, Burnout and Psychological Health among Remote Workers during the Pandemic: The Moderating Role of E-Work Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Hazra, Ummaha & Priyo, Asad Karim Khan, 2022. "Unethical practices in online classes during COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of affordances using routine activity theory," MPRA Paper 117853, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Jakob Wirth & Tim Weitzel, 2022. "Trial-Period Technostress: A Conceptual Definition and Mixed-Methods Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 489-514, June.
    17. Nam C. Nguyen & Ockie J. H. Bosch & Fung Yen Ong & Jin Shan Seah & Athena Succu & Thanh V. Nguyen & Kwamina E. Banson, 2016. "A Systemic Approach to Understand Smartphone Usage in Singapore," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 360-380, May.
    18. Cao, Xiongfei & Yu, Lingling, 2019. "Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 83-92.
    19. Wiebke Schlenger & Marlies Jöllenbeck & Tjorven Stamer & Angelika Grosse & Elke Ochsmann, 2022. "Digitizing Social Counseling—Insights for Workplace Health Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Fakhar Shahzad & Jianguo Du & Imran Khan & Adnan Fateh & Muhammad Shahbaz & Adnan Abbas & Muhammad Umair Wattoo, 2020. "Perceived Threat of COVID-19 Contagion and Frontline Paramedics’ Agonistic Behaviour: Employing a Stressor–Strain–Outcome Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ICT (Information and Communication Techonology); stress; technostress;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csc:ircrwp:201708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Perin or Giancarlo Birello (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cerisit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.