IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crs/wpaper/2018-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Réponse à des Critiques du Jugement Majoritaire

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Balinski

    (CREST; CNRS ; Ecole Polytechnique)

Abstract

L'article de J.-F. Laslier [26] presente une description tres etrange du nouveau mode de scrutin appele le jugement majoritaire; de ses proprietes; de ses supposes paradoxes et antecedents. Cette r eponse clarifie les faits.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Balinski, 2018. "Réponse à des Critiques du Jugement Majoritaire," Working Papers 2018-10, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2018-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crest.science/RePEc/wpstorage/2018-10.pdf
    File Function: CREST working paper version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric E. Giraud-Heraud & Marie-Claude Pichery, 2013. "Wine Economics: Quantitative Studies and Empirical Applications," Post-Print halshs-01231763, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Marc Touzard & Yuna Chiffoleau & Camille Maffezzoli, 2016. "What Is Local or Global about Wine? An Attempt to Objectivize a Social Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Michel Balinski & Rida Laraki, 2020. "Majority judgment vs. majority rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(2), pages 429-461, March.
    3. Mihaela BIRSAN, 2018. "Strategic Development Model in the Era of Globalization. Case Study: Purcari Wineries Public Company Limited," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Carmen NÄ‚STASE (ed.), The 14th Economic International Conference: Strategies and Development Policies of Territories: International, Country, Region, City, Location Challen, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 12, pages 113-133, Editura Lumen.
    4. Masset, Philippe & Weisskopf, Jean-Philippe & Faye, Benoît & Le Fur, Eric, 2016. "Red obsession: The ascent of fine wine in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 200-225.
    5. Carlucci, Fabio & Corcione, Carlo & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Trincone, Barbara, 2021. "The role of logistics in promoting Italian agribusiness: The Belt and Road Initiative case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Ana MARTA-COSTA & Vitor MARTINHO & Micael SANTOS, 2017. "Productive Efficiency Of Portuguese Vineyard Regions," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 97-107, December.
    7. Oczkowski Edward, 2022. "Price Premiums and Discounts for Australian Sparkling Wines," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 25-38, May.
    8. Vlašicová, Eliška & Náglová, Zdeňka, 2015. "Differences in the Economic Situation of Organic and Conventional Winemaking Enterprises," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, September.
    9. Caracciolo, Francesco & D’Amico, Mario & Di Vita, Giuseppe & Pomarici, Eugenio & Dal Bianco, Andrea & Cembalo, Luigi, 2016. "Private vs. Collective Wine Reputation," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Jara-Rojas, Roberto & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Solis, Daniel & Arriagada, Daniela Martinez, 2017. "Technical Efficiency and Marketing Channels Among Small-Scale Farmers: Evidence for Raspberry Production in Chile," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(3), November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2018-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crestfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.