IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cnz/wpaper/472012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

(English) Gender inequality and housework (Italiano) Disuguaglianze di genere e attività domestiche

Author

Listed:
  • Adele Menniti
  • Pietro Demurtas

Abstract

(English) Using data from the Italian Time-Use survey carried out by ISTAT in 2008-2009, the paper analyses the time spent on housework by men and women. The study focuses on a sub-sample of couples, married and in a non-marital unions, with employed women aged 20-49 years. The paper presents the results of a multivariate analysis that aims to evaluate the effects of individual and household characteristics on time spent in domestic chores and on their distribution between men and women. The results of the regression models sustain some of the assumptions underlying the theory of the time availability and relative resources. Education has opposite effects on domestic work, with high educated women doing less and high educated men doing more comparing with those having low education level. More, when women contribute more to the household income compared to their partners, husbands’ time spent on housework increases and that of women decreases, as relative resources perspective predicts. Couples living in southern Italy, as well as those where the woman works part-time, show the wider gender gap in time allocated to domestic chores. (Italiano) Il contributo analizza il tempo dedicato al lavoro domestico di uomini e donne utilizzando l'indagine Istat sull'Uso del Tempo del 2008/2009. L'analisi è condotta su un sotto-campione di 2930 coppie, coniugate e conviventi, con donne occupate di 20-49 anni. Nel rapporto vengono presentati i risultati di un'analisi multivariata allo scopo di valutare gli effetti di alcune caratteristiche individuali e di coppia sul tempo dedicato alle attività domestiche da uomini e donne alla luce di alcuni approcci teorici presenti in letteratura. Dai risultati emerge che nell’allocazione del tempo dedicato alle attività domestiche, l’istruzione ha un effetto opposto negli uomini e nelle donne: queste ultime lo riducono mentre gli uomini lo aumentano rispetto a chi ha basse credenziali educative. Inoltre, laddove le donne contribuiscono in misura maggiore al reddito familiare rispetto ai loro partner, il tempo dedicato al lavoro domestico aumenta per gli uomini e si riduce per le donne, corroborando alcune delle ipotesi formulate a partire dalla teoria delle risorse relative. Al contrario, i maggiori gap di genere si evidenziano nelle coppie meridionali e in quelle in cui la donna lavora part-time.

Suggested Citation

  • Adele Menniti & Pietro Demurtas, 2012. "(English) Gender inequality and housework (Italiano) Disuguaglianze di genere e attività domestiche," IRPPS Working Papers 47:2012, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies.
  • Handle: RePEc:cnz:wpaper:47:2012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.irpps.cnr.it/e-pub/ojs/files/journals/4/articles/66/public/66-209-2-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter McDonald, 2000. "Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 26(3), pages 427-439.
    2. Mette Deding & Mette Lausten, 2006. "Choosing between his time and her time? Paid and unpaid work of Danish couples," electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)) and The International Association for Time Use Research (IATUR), vol. 3(1), pages 28-48, August.
    3. Daniela Del Boca & Silvia Pasqua & Chiara Pronzato, 2004. "Employment and Fertility Decisions in Italy, France and the U.K," CHILD Working Papers wp08_04, CHILD - Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic economics - ITALY.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cnz:wpaper:47:2012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sveva Avveduto). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/irppsit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.