IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Economic evaluation in health care decision making: evidence from the UK

  • Mike Drummond


    (Centre for Health Economics, The University of York)

  • Jonathan Cooke
  • Tom Walley
Registered author(s):

    Although economic evaluation in health care has a long-standing tradition in the United Kingdom, very little is known about its impact on decision making, particularly following the introduction of the internal market. Since managed competition appears to be growing in popularity worldwide, the UK is an interesting case study, as the reforms are well underway and there have been a number of efforts to conduct and to disseminate economic evaluations. In this paper the potential for using economic evaluation in health care decision making in the UK is discussed. Then its actual impact is assessed in two ways. First, two case studies are discussed, on heart transplantation and the use of pharmaceuticals in the management of labour in pregnancy. Secondly, new data from a recent survey of potential users of economic evaluations are presented, with the emphasis on exploring the reasons for the impact, or lack of impact, of economic results. It is concluded that the NHS reforms increase the potential for the use of economic evaluation. However, there is a need to increase decision makers’ awareness of economic studies and to help them study methodology and results. Although worries about validity of economic studies is one of the major barriers to their use, other important barriers relate to the multiple objectives being pursued, of which increased efficiency is just one, and the difficulties of freeing resources from existing services in order to divert them to more cost-effective treatments and programmes.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version,1996
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number 148chedp.

    in new window

    Length: 36 pages
    Date of creation: Apr 1996
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:148chedp
    Contact details of provider: Postal: York Y010 5DD
    Phone: (01904) 321401
    Fax: (0)1904 323759
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Davies, Linda & Coyle, Douglas & Drummond, Michael & The EC Network on the Methodology of Economic Appraisal of Health Technology, 1994. "Current status of economic appraisal of health technology in the European community: Report of the network," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1601-1607, June.
    2. Henshall, Christopher & Drummond, Michael, 1994. "Economic appraisal in the British national health service: Implications of recent developments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1615-1623, June.
    3. Ross, Jayne, 1995. "The use of economic evaluation in health care: Australian decision makers' perceptions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 103-110, February.
    4. Douglas Coyle, 1993. "Increasing the impact of economic evaluations on health care decision-making," Working Papers 108chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    5. Linda Davies & Mike Drummond, 1993. "The costs of induction of labour by prostaglandin E2 or oxytocin: refining the estimates," Working Papers 109chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:148chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frances Sharp)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.