IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cfi/fseres/cf506.html

Bank Regulatory Reforms and Declining Diversity of Bank Credit Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Takeo Hoshi

    (The University of Tokyo)

  • Ke Wang

    (Federal Reserve Board)

Abstract

This paper addresses the concerns on correlated risks across banks that tightening regulation may have induced. Facing higher required capital ratio after the global financial crisis, a bank can reduce the risk-weighted assets by shifting its portfolios from asset classes with high risk-weights to asset classes with low risk-weights. This may reduce the risk exposures of individual banks, but may end up concentrating various banks’ assets to the same set of low risk assets, hence increase the joint default probability and systemic risk of the banking system. Using risk-weighted asset data in Form FFIEC101, reported by the U.S. banks that are allowed to use the advanced approach, we show banks’ average risk weights indeed declined since 2010, partly due to portfolio shifts in credit allocation. We measure the convergence in credit allocation by the cosine similarity of portfolio compositions for pairs of banks. We document that the average cosine similarity across the advanced approach banks rose monotonically and significantly since 2010, which coincides with a period of tightened capital regulations. Finally, we observe that the two prevailing systemic risk measures –SRISK and CoVaR –also show signs of convergence among banks during the same time period. We conclude that the capital regulation may have unintended consequences on systemic risk by encouraging herd behavior across regulated banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeo Hoshi & Ke Wang, 2021. "Bank Regulatory Reforms and Declining Diversity of Bank Credit Allocation," CARF F-Series CARF-F-506, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
  • Handle: RePEc:cfi:fseres:cf506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.carf.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/admin/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/F506.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Brownlees & Robert F. Engle, 2017. "SRISK: A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(1), pages 48-79.
    2. Kleymenova, Anya & Rose, Andrew K. & Wieladek, Tomasz, 2016. "Does government intervention affect banking globalization?," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 146-161.
    3. Falk Bräuning & José Fillat, 2019. "Stress testing effects on portfolio similarities among large US Banks," Current Policy Perspectives 19-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    4. Kevin J. Stiroh, 2018. "Supervisory implications of rising similarity in banking: remarks at the Financial Times U.S. Banking Forum: Charting a Course for Stability and Success, New York City," Speech 299, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Böhnke, Victoria & Ongena, Steven & Paraschiv, Florentina & Reite, Endre J., 2023. "Back to the roots of internal credit risk models: Does risk explain why banks' risk-weighted asset levels converge over time?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abduraimova, Kumushoy, 2022. "Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Gerardo Manzo & Antonio Picca, 2020. "The Impact of Sovereign Shocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 3113-3132, July.
    3. Mikhail Stolbov & Maria Shchepeleva, 2022. "In Search of Global Determinants of National Credit-to-GDP Gaps," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Hamdi Jbir & Cornel Oros & Alexandra Popescu, 2024. "Macroprudential policy and financial system stability: an aggregate study," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(5), pages 1941-1973, May.
    5. Yang, Xite & Zhang, Qin & Liu, Haiyue & Liu, Zihan & Tao, Qiufan & Lai, Yongzeng & Huang, Linya, 2024. "Economic policy uncertainty, macroeconomic shocks, and systemic risk: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    6. Kiwoong Byun & Baeho Kim & Dong Hwan Oh, 2023. "Systemic Credit Risk Premium: Insights from Credit Derivatives Markets," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2023-055r1, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), revised 04 Aug 2025.
    7. Roland Füss & Daniel Ruf, 2018. "Office Market Interconnectedness and Systemic Risk Exposure," Working Papers on Finance 1830, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    8. Liu, Ziyi & Zhang, Yue & Chen, Haozhi, 2025. "Research on systemic risk measurement based on temporal financial knowledge graph: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Colak, Gonul & Filippidis, Michail & Filis, George & Tzouvanas, Panagiotis, 2025. "Systemic risk and oil price volatility shocks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Ayadi, Rym & Bongini, Paola & Casu, Barbara & Cucinelli, Doriana, 2025. "The origin of financial instability and systemic risk: Do bank business models matter?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Xisong Jin, 2018. "How much does book value data tell us about systemic risk and its interactions with the macroeconomy? A Luxembourg empirical evaluation," BCL working papers 118, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    12. Dissem, Sonia & Lobez, Frederic, 2020. "Correlation between the 2014 EU-wide stress tests and the market-based measures of systemic risk," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    13. Algieri, Bernardina & Leccadito, Arturo, 2017. "Assessing contagion risk from energy and non-energy commodity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 312-322.
    14. Matteo Foglia & Eliana Angelini, 2024. "A Riskmas Carol," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2_suppl), pages 121-137, April.
    15. Schwaab, Bernd, 2017. "Bank business models at negative interest rates," Research Bulletin, European Central Bank, vol. 40.
    16. Li, Yawen & Xia, Yufei & Sun, Zongting & Sun, Naili, 2025. "Does digital transformation affect systemic risk? Evidence from the banking sector in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Denisa Banulescu-Radu & Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Olivier Scaillet, 2021. "Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5730-5754, September.
    18. Alin Marius Andrieş & Simona Nistor, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Foreign Currency Positions of Banks: Evidence from Emerging Europe," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 382-421, September.
    19. Li, Rui & Li, Jianping & Zhu, Xiaoqian, 2025. "Downside belief disagreements and financial instability: Evidence from risk factor disclosures in U.S. financial institutions’ 10-K filings," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Dominika Langenmayr & Franz Reiter, 2022. "Trading offshore: evidence on banks’ tax avoidance," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(3), pages 797-837, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cfi:fseres:cf506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catokjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.